The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. Arrest and search of the applicant   5 .

THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1956 and lives in Grozny (Chechen Republic). She was represented by Mr I.Y. Timishev, a lawyer. 3.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of the applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1956 and lives in Žilina. He was represented by Ms T. Polková, a lawyer practising in Žilina. 3.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

He also complained about the fact that the first-instance court had not ruled on his claim for compensation, despite the fact that there had allegedly been enough material in the case file to enable it

They further said that by imposing significant court fees, the courts had in fact sanctioned them and had taken away all that had been awarded.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1970 and is currently serving a prison sentence. 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Donji Kraljevec. 5.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.     The applicant was born in 1973 and lives in Constanţa. 7.

    A detailed account of the facts, the criminal investigation and the domestic courts’ decisions has been described in Haxhia v. Albania , no.

  296 of 27 December 2006 (“Law no. 296/2006”) had violated their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 2.

    The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that   they had been denied the right to a fair trial since the SJC’s notice of 13   March 2013, submitted with the

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 4.

In particular, she submitted that the fact that she had eventually received the writ of execution at her address in Australia and that all previous attempts to serve the summons on her at that address

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The applicant did not dispute the fact that his actions had been unlawful.