CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3099399-3432069
20 avril 2010
Although the truth of value judgments was not susceptible of proof, the applicant had been asked to furnish such proof and had been convicted on the basis that no competent authority had expressly found
Page 52 sur 477
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0621DEC005736216
21 juin 2018
According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-79830
28 février 2007
required defendants to prove the truth of any impugned negative statements, irrespective of whether they were factual statements or, as in this case, value judgments which should not be susceptible of proof
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201DEC005877721
1 février 2024
The Government offered to pay the applicant 40% of the sums awarded by the judgment of the Venice District Court, R.G. 347/04 of 23/05/2005 and which the applicant returned, provided that she gives proof
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC004066717
13 septembre 2018
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11163
23 août 2016
(b) Personal circumstances – The Court noted that, as asylum-seekers were normally the only parties able to provide information about their own personal circumstances, the burden of proof
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110DEC001727418
10 novembre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0222DEC005617919
22 février 2022
The crux of the matter lies in the applicant’s failure to submit proof of his identity.
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1146237-1188502
28 septembre 2004
The Ministry of the Interior appealed, however, arguing that all relevant documents had been destroyed and that the onus of proof concerning the location of the coins was on the applicant.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14071
11 mai 2023
In relation to confiscation of property linked to serious offences, the Court did not require proof “beyond reasonable doubt” of the illicit origins of the property.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0131JUD003923217
31 janvier 2023
In previous cases against Bulgaria the Court has criticised the level of proof required by the national courts as regards non-pecuniary damage stemming from unlawful detention.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250088
17 avril 2026
, the JER noted that S had denied having been asked to pronounce himself on the competences of Z and thus it had not been proved that he had supported Z’s nomination, and there had not been concrete proof
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0909DEC007800501
9 septembre 2008
To assess this evidence, the Court has generally applied the standard of proof “beyond reasonable doubt” (see Talat Tepe v. Turkey , no. 31247/96, § 48, 21 December 2004).
Urgences
DTA_2508911_20250802
2 août 2025
, demandent au tribunal, statuant en application des dispositions de l'article L. 779-1 du code de justice administrative, dans le dernier état de leurs écritures : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté n° 2025-PREF-DCSIPC-BOPCS
Tribunal Administratif de Cergy-Pontoise
DTA_2506403_20250429
29 avril 2025
des 21 mars 2025, 25 mars 2025, 27 mars 2025 et une demande de communication des motifs de la décision de rejet née du silence gardé pendant plus de quatre mois sur sa demande, transmise à l'adresse " pref-bse
ECLI:CEDH:001-55714
9 juin 1999
In their claims for compensation, victims or their heirs shall provide proof of their infection with the human immunodeficiency virus and of the transfusion of blood products or injections of blood
Cour administrative d'appel de Paris
DCA_22PA04020_20240319
19 mars 2024
Vu la procédure suivante : Procédure contentieuse antérieure : La société Wille Geotechnik / Aps Antriebs Prüf und Steuertechnik Gmbh (société Wille Geotechnik) a demandé au tribunal administratif
6ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_22MA01117_20231016
16 octobre 2023
note n° 2017-178 du 24 novembre 2017, relative à l'accès au grade de professeur des écoles de classe exceptionnelle : " L'inspecteur de l'éducation nationale (IEN) formule un avis via l'application I-Prof
4ème Chambre
DTA_2202403_20250428
28 avril 2025
Par une décision révélée par un message électronique accessible sur la plateforme " I-Prof " le 9 mars 2022, M. D a été informé du rejet de sa demande de mutation.
DTA_2205700_20250521
21 mai 2025
Il ressort des pièces du dossier, et notamment de l'avis du SDIS des Alpes-Maritimes en date du 19 mai 2022, que le projet se situe en zone B1a du plan de prévention des risques d'incendies de forêt (PPRIF