CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14098
1 juin 2023
Following the initial communication of the case, a Chamber of the Court of its own motion invited the parties to submit further written observations under Article 6 § 1, notably related to whether, given
Page 52 sur 351
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-165017
24 juin 2016
It appears from the documents in the case file that in the course of the proceedings before the first-instance court the applicant and the ABA raised a number of motions and requests.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0115DEC003011903
15 janvier 2008
several defendants concerning disputes about their common rights or obligations or rights and obligations arising out of the same facts, each party to the proceedings acts independently of the others and motions
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC005006906
30 juin 2009
On 3 October 2005 the Oława District Court rejected the applicant’s motions to correct errors in the minutes from the previous hearings.
ECLI:CEDH:001-166881
1 septembre 2016
On 9 and 11 September 2009 the applicant’s representative filed several motions concerning the alleged violation of the presumption of innocence as part of the criminal proceedings pending
4ème chambre jugeant seule
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2022:445306.20221125
25 novembre 2022
recrutement d'un professeur du CNAM sur la chaire tourisme, voyage et loisirs ", le conseil scientifique siégeant en formation restreinte a voté à l'unanimité, lors de sa séance du 25 février 2020, une " motion
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2015:C101115
14 octobre 2015
Il ressort en effet du procès-verbal de ladite assemblée générale ayant consacré son " élection ", qui n'avait pas la nature d'une assemblée générale extraordinaire : - qu'a été adoptée une motion, ayant
2ème Chambre
DTA_2100067_20230803
3 août 2023
Par un mémoire en défense enregistré le 17 juin 2022, la commune de Fontaine, représentée par Me Mollion, conclut au rejet de la requête et à la mise à la charge de la SCCV Liberté d'une somme de 3 000
DTA_2100068_20230803
ECLI:CEDH:001-165019
23 juin 2016
It appears from the documents in the case file that in the course of the proceedings before the first-instance court the applicant raised a number of requests and motions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC004188998
30 mars 1999
The hearing of 3 July 1997 was postponed by the Airola Magistrate of his own motion.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0910JUD003133306
10 septembre 2010
Neither party attended on that date, due to a misunderstanding, and the motion was struck out.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0204JUD002472305
4 février 2016
The courts shall examine motions seeking to have investigative and operative ‑ search measures carried out... ... 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD005777413
12 janvier 2016
in case it is ill-founded or by reassigning the case to another court in case the motion is well-founded.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD002685304
13 juillet 2006
The court dismissed the motion without giving any reasons. 36.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9678
24 juin 1993
petitions on 20 November 1985 and then only in relation to acts, decisions, facts or events subsequent to that date - plea not raised by Government and not calling for consideration by Court of its own motion
ECLI:CEDH:002-3496
12 janvier 2006
The public prosecutor’s office opened a criminal investigation of its own motion, which included a ballistics report and an examination of the bodies. A new preliminary investigation was begun.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3678
25 octobre 2005
The European Court first left open the question whether the applicant should have lodged a constitutional complaint of his own motion in order to challenge the impugned provisions.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC000164312
1 octobre 2013
The President of the Section of his own motion decided that the applicants’ identity was not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 3).
ECLI:CEDH:001-203736
20 juin 2020
On 20 March 2019 the Gdańsk Civil Status Office requalified the applicant’s motion as a request to create an entry of their marriage in the Marriage Registry and dismissed their request.