CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0930JUD000592820
30 septembre 2021
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.
Page 52 sur 1211
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD004406515
16 décembre 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1014JUD003550320
14 octobre 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD002486321
24 octobre 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0905JUD005292121
5 septembre 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD001450025
2 avril 2026
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192854
3 avril 2019
The circumstances established during the examination of the case and the evidence presented before the court demonstrate that the level of air pollution in Lipetsk is high.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC002403006
17 février 2009
1 October 2008 1,080 € 280 € 1,360 € 3. 25084/06 Sonja NOVAKOVIČ 30 May 2006 28 August 2000 19 April 2006 five years and eight months at two levels of jurisdiction 6 October 2008 1,440 €
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120DEC002792107
20 janvier 2015
On 10 April 2006 the applicant lodged an application with the Timişoara Court of First Instance seeking recognition of its right of representation at company level. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC001553906
7 avril 2009
On 1 October, 7 October, 13 October, 11 November and 9 December 2008 each of the applicants informed the Court, in writing, that the cases had been settled at the domestic level and that
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0513DEC000402203
13 mai 2008
2008 1,620€ 417.75€ 2,037.75€ 2 980/04 KUNŠEK Anton 6 years and 2 months for 3 levels of jurisdiction 18 February 2008 450€ 292.77€ 742.77€ 3 1247/04 JAŠAREVIČ Sladjana 5 years for 1 level of jurisdiction
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD001546021
1 décembre 2022
ECLI:CEDH:001-150528
18 décembre 2014
of the areas marked on the city development plan and shall not exceed: Maximum reception levels: (...)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD001515319
5 octobre 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD000823522
11 avril 2024
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-499137-500452
19 février 2002
Italy (no. 56213/00) (approximately eight years and 10 months for two levels of jurisdiction) EUR 7,000 EUR 1,500 (15) Ripoli v.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3813
9 juin 2005
In 1995, the applicant brought a court action seeking resettlement outside the zone, arguing that the concentration of toxic elements and noise levels in the sanitary security zone was dangerous to health
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:CO00337
1 avril 2014
LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Rennes, 4 décembre 2012), que la société Leveque Niort agencement (la société
4ème chambre jugeant seule
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2023:473863.20231228
28 décembre 2023
code des relations entre le public et l'administration ; - le code de la santé publique ; - le code de justice administrative ; Après avoir entendu en séance publique : - le rapport de Mme Marie-Anne Lévêque
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC005036508
6 octobre 2009
granted at domestic level must nevertheless not be manifestly inadequate in the particular circumstances of the case (see the principles established under the Court’s case-law in Cocchiarella v.