This would ensure that the application was brought with the consent of the victim of the alleged breach and would avoid actio popularis applications (see İlhan v.

    The relevant domestic law and practice are set out in the judgment of İlhan v. Turkey ([GC], no. 22277/93, §§   35-46, ECHR   2000-VII). THE LAW I.

The tenth applicant, Mr Ilfan Sadik Ademi, was born in 1952. He lives in Germany. The eleventh applicant, Mr Zoran Minić, was born in 1972. He lives in Serbia. 2.

reiterates that in order to lodge an application under Article   34 of the Convention, an individual must be able to show that he or she was “directly affected” by the measure complained of (see   İlhan

Russia , nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, § 174, 24   February 2005; and İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no.   22277/93, § 75, ECHR 2000-VII). 94.

as a whole, demonstrates that it covers not only intentional killing but also situations where it is permitted to use force which may result, as an unintended outcome, in the deprivation of life (see İlhan

It must then examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected of him or her to exhaust domestic remedies (see İlhan v.

  Turquie , n o 36749/97, §§ 70-77, 13 septembre 2005, Kaya , précité, § 108, et İlhan , precité, § 103). IV.     SUR L'APPLICATION DE L'ARTICLE 41 DE LA CONVENTION 56.

Toutefois, le recours exigé par l’article 13 doit être «   effectif   » en fait comme en droit (par exemple, arrêt İlhan c. Turquie [GC], n o 22277/93, § 97, CEDH 2000-VII). 41.

obligations under Article   13 varies depending on the nature of the applicant's complaint; however, the remedy required by Article 13 must be “effective” in practice as well as in law (see, for example, Ilhan

Toutefois, le recours exigé par l'article 13 doit être «   effectif   » en pratique comme en droit (voir, par exemple, İlhan c. Turquie [GC], n o 22277/93, § 97, CEDH 2000-VII).

Turquie , arrêt du 25   septembre 1997, Recueil 1997-VI, pp. 1895-1896, § 103   ; pour la discussion sur cette question, voir İlhan c.

Although the failure to comply with such an obligation may have consequences for the right protected under Article 13, the procedural obligation of Article 2 is seen as a distinct obligation ( see İlhan

Türkiye 19/12/2022 Ümit KURU 1983 Adana Turkish İlhan ÖNGÖR 188. 1469/23 Uslu v. Türkiye 18/10/2022 Serkan USLU 1984 Eskişehir Turkish Kamile KILDAN 189. 1595/23 Danışman v.

COUR D'APPEL D'[Localité 1] CHAMBRE A - CIVILE GG/ILAF ARRET N°: AFFAIRE N° RG 24/00906 - N° Portalis DBVP-V-B7I-FKFA ordonnance du 25 avril 2024 Juge de la mise en état du MANS n° d'inscription

COUR D'APPEL D'ANGERS CHAMBRE A - CIVILE MP/ILAF ARRET N°: AFFAIRE N° RG 24/00544 - N° Portalis DBVP-V-B7I-FJKY jugement du 27 février 2024 TJ hors JAF, JEX, JLD, J.

Haydar KORKMAZ 01/01/1965 Malatya Ayfer YİGİTOĞLU 08/07/1972 Malatya Tarik GÖKÇEN 08/12/1962 Malatya Ali YİĞİTOĞLU 05/01/1970 Malatya Hasan ARAR 01/09/1966 Malatya Tacettin ŞAŞ 26/10/1968 Malatya Savaş İLHAN

Istanbul       Requête n o 64965/09   N o Prénom NOM Année de naissance Nationalité Lieu de résidence 1 Ceyhun GÖKSUN 1949 turc Istanbul 2 Aliye Hülya GÖKSUN 1945 turque Istanbul 3 İlhan

plus généralement, la détention d’une personne malade dans des conditions inadéquates peuvent en principe constituer un traitement contraire à l’article   3 de la Convention (voir, par exemple, İlhan