She did not request the appellate court to hold an oral hearing, and the court did not hold a hearing on its own motion.

The counsel’s request that the hearing be adjourned on account of his sudden illness had not been noted in the minutes of the hearing.

The first-instance judge concluded in connection with the statements of the applicant and the defence witnesses that they were made up with the sole purpose of helping the applicant to evade criminal responsibility

At the material time, the applicant was a student and an unpaid aid to a lawyer, T., helping him out with the translation of legal documents.

Article 8-1 Respect for home Burning of houses belonging to Roma villagers and alleged failure of the authorities to prevent the attack: admissible   Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing

Convention that the non-communication of the Chief Public Prosecutor’s written opinions in the proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court had violated their right to an adversarial and fair hearing

This means that the parties must, by the preparatory hearing, name all those persons whom they wish to call as witnesses in the main hearing.

The hearing scheduled for 27 February 1996 was adjourned because of the absence of a lay judge. On 27 March 1996 the court held a hearing.

to a violation of her right to a fair hearing.

He also requested to be present at the hearing of the police officer who had fined him if the judge decided to hold an oral hearing. 6.

  The court did not hold an oral hearing in the case.   It appears that the applicant did not request such a hearing.

On 15 April 1999 and 31 May 1999 the court held preparatory hearings. The main hearing was held on 23 August 1999, at which one witness was heard.

Oral hearing Tax surcharge imposed without an oral hearing: no violation Facts : A tax office imposed tax surcharges on the applicant amounting to 10% of his re-assessed tax liability.

He subsequently requested an oral hearing on his appeal.

  Abbasov, at the hearing of 21 September 2007 before the Supreme Court.

at the hearing.

The third hearing was held on 23 March 1995.

reasons against holding a hearing.”

hearing.

forgoing a hearing.