He had not had any visible injuries; she had only seen that there had been marks on [the applicant’s] hands from handcuffs.

Without being provided any explanation, he had been asked whether he had drugs on him, which he had denied.

    K.G. had had a pistol put to his head, had been pistol-whipped on his head, had had shots fired between his legs, had been kicked, and had had boiling water poured on him.

M.S. had thought that they had been beaten in the prison. The escort officers had not assaulted them. 29.

He had not had any other symptoms and the pain had ceased after a few days. 34.

stated that she had originally got to know S. online and that after they had met they had sometimes gone out together – when asked whether their outings had been romantic she replied that they had been

    The Government submitted that between 22 July and 18 September 2014, the applicant had been held in a cell where smoking had been allowed, which had been fitted with ten beds and which had

They had gone to the village and he had asked the driver to wait outside the village until he brought the sheep. Then, when he had approached the shepherd, a dog had attacked him.

The Court thus had to consider whether, as the Government had claimed, the charges against Mr Kavala had changed in substance. In examining this question, the Court found as follows.

According to the judgment, the applicant had been duly notified of the hearing but had not appeared.

prisoners in Sofia Prison, and that he had had no remedy in respect of those complaints.

The applicants had been given misleading and contradictory information and had not received appropriate and objective medical counselling that had due regard to their views and wishes.

There had also been several cases where the domestic courts had found that setting a date for a hearing had depended on the internal organisation of the court, that no damage had been caused to the claimant

Furthermore, the scope of their review had been sufficient to comply with the requirements of Article 6 § 1. The applicants had therefore had their action examined in detail by a court.

case, when it was considered too late to control what had been spent; thirdly, there had been the “blackmail” or “chilling” effect due to the fact that the costs burden on the opposing parties had been

The court had held that the witness statements and other evidence in the file had shown that she had simply kept the companies’ accounts while following the administrators’ instructions and had therefore

C also stated that he had had difficulty in running and apprehending Mr Zabchekov because he had had a leg injury and his shoelaces had been untied. 16.

She therefore had standing to complain under Article 10.

had been masked by a balaclava.