On an unspecified date thereafter the applicant paid the fine. 2.

      44135/21* 30/08/2021 Roksana Filippovna GALIAKBEROVA 1993   Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kazan   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine

He paid the fines on 3   October 2016. The information about the payment was processed by the bailiff’s office several months later (see paragraph 11 below). 4.

#ECSC Treaty - Failure to observe price lists - Fine.#Case 9/83.

2021 respectively communicated on 17 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the allegedly unjustified refusal to grant the applicant access to public information and his being fined

On fourteen different occasions between 2 July 2017 and 18 December 2018 the applicant was warned, fined and/or his access to the Romanian Gendarmery’s webpages was blocked because: (a)     he

de la société SD COLLECTION selon laquelle Monsieur X... et un représentant de la société FINETTE ont été reçus par les représentants de la société FINETTE «pour finaliser la vente de la carte des tricots

1810, DEFAUT ET CONTRADICTION DE MOTIFS, MANQUE DE BASE LEGALE ; ATTENDU QUE LA SOCIETE DES ETABLISSEMENTS DAMET FAIT GRIEF A L'ARRET ATTAQUE DE L'AVOIR CONDAMNEE A PAYER A SON ANCIEN REPRESENTANT FINET

On 27   October 2008 the Service issued a decision imposing a fine on the applicant under Article   203 of the Customs Code.

    On 22 June 2010 the applicant was fined by a traffic police officer for a traffic offence.

The applicant challenged the application of the fine, arguing that he had been denied the very right to access to court.

As a result, the applicant was fined approximately EUR   1,200. He appealed unsuccessfully to the Supreme Court. His client was convicted as charged.

On 28 May 2020 the applicant was convicted of two minor offences under the Road Traffic Safety Act and fined in the amount equivalent to approximately 1,700 euros in Serbian dinars.

Under section 49(2) such a minor offence is punishable with a   maximum fine of SKK 3,000.

origine à la fois dans des dépenses personnelles ou professionnelles particulièrement importantes et surtout dans la construction d'une villa d'un coût extrêmement onéreux (v. arrêt attaqué, p. 8, in fine

The applicant was fined 1,000 Slovak korunas (SKK) and ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings of SKK 150.

On 22 September 2006 the Sălaj Tax Agency fined the applicant company 200 lei (RON) (approximately 60 euros (EUR)) and ordered the confiscation of RON 32,155 (approximately EUR 9,500), a sum of money the

A fine of between RON 1,000 and 2,000 was provided by Article 133 (c) for committing such an offence. 21 .

dérivant présente un caractère urgent au vu de la capacité de ces filets à intercepter saumons, aloses ou esturgeons dont les populations résiduelles sont très faibles ; l'usage de ce filet préjudicie

hypothétique" ; "alors que, en exigeant une "certitude", la cour d'appel a méconnu la notion de perte de chance et violé les textes susvisés ; "alors que, dans ses conclusions d'appel, (p. 1 in fine