The Military Regional Court terminated the proceedings after finding that there had been procedural shortcomings, in particular as it had not been established whether the accused had been armed with sub-machine

délivré le 8 mars 2021 par le maire de La Bernerie-en-Retz a été régularisé.

    On 20 March 1998 the Federal Minister dismissed the applicant’s request on the grounds that the trip had not been an official journey – this having been made clear by the fact that the applicant

In a letter of 5 March 2007 the Ministry of Justice informed the applicant that his application had been accepted, that it had been found that his right to a determination of his civil claim within a reasonable

detained had constantly been filled to twice or three times their capacity.

The Commission expressed the opinion unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention, unanimously that it was not necessary to decide whether there had been a violation of Article

  The Court held by 6 votes to 1 that there had been no violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights. ( The judgment is available only in French. ) &#

They also stated that the warrant had been issued after the applicant, who had been running a small business, had failed to pay social security contributions.

been excessive, the domestic courts’ decisions had not been reasoned, and the proceedings had not been adversarial.

concluded that the actions of the officers had been lawful.

; - les motifs justifiant ces dispositions sont entachés d'erreur de fait ; - l'article R. 424-5 du code de l'environnement méconnaît l'article L. 424-10 du même code ainsi que la convention de Berne

(see details in Appendix);   Whereas in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been

He further maintained that he had not been informed of the charges against him, that he did not have legal assistance during the investigation and that he had been deprived of his right to have adequate

Since the evacuation, the applicant and his family have been living in Elazığ.

He reported that his house had been damaged by unknown persons and that some of his belongings had been stolen.

de décision : B N° RG 26/03108 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7K-CNJZ4 Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 31 mai 2026, à 13h36, par le magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire d'Evry Nous, Laurent Ben-Kemoun

LES TOITS DU BEARN C/ S.C.I.

  In its Chamber judgment of 12 December 2006 (press release no. 777), the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been no violation of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 1 of

  In its Chamber judgment of 30 January 2007 (press release no. 70) the Court held by five votes to 2 that there had been no violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1.

with the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions through the indirect expropriation of their land was incompatible with the principle of legality and that there had accordingly been