Article 148 of the new Code of Criminal Procedure (Law no.

174, alinéa 1er, du Code de procédure pénale ; D'où il suit que le moyen ne saurait être accueilli ; Sur le second moyen de cassation, pris de la violation des articles 171, 172, 175, 591 et 593

    Article 28 A of the Criminal Code, Chapter 9 of the Laws of Malta, contains the provision for sentences of imprisonment to be suspended and Article 21 of the same code provides for the handing

The second applicant was convicted of an offence under the then Article 70 of the Criminal Code. He was acquitted of sabotage (Article 67 of the Criminal Code as then in force).

Aux termes des dispositions de l'alinéa 2 de l'article L. 512-7-3 du code de l'environnement : " En vue d'assurer la protection des intérêts mentionnés à l'article L. 511-1 et, le cas échéant, à l'article

    Article 22 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance   also enlists a number of circumstances where Article 21 of the Criminal Code does not apply.

According to Articles 334 and 350 1 of the Code, the appellate court, when examining a separate appeal, had a right to examine de novo evidence, as well as evidence which had already been examined by the

    The relevant provisions of the Criminal Code read as follows: Article 2 § 2 “Where the legislative provisions in force at the time when a crime is committed are different from those of a

On the same day the prosecutor’s office initiated a criminal investigation into the abduction of four persons, under Article 127 § 2 of the Criminal Code (unlawful deprivation of liberty).

du 11° du I de l’article D. 181-15-2 du code de l’environnement ; - il méconnaît les dispositions de l’article R. 122-5 du code de l’environnement, l’étude d’impact étant entachée de plusieurs inexactitudes

individuals had been found liable under Article 173-3 of the Code of Administrative Offences.

Code.

The presiding judge is to decide on any such challenge to the empanelled jury (Articles 326–330). B.     Witnesses 1.

  It must therefore examine whether the interference was justified under paragraph 2 of Article 10 (art. 10-2). A. Was the interference "prescribed by law"? 29.

them to seven and five years’ imprisonment respectively, whilst Mr A.K. was convicted of being a “thief in law” (Article 223(1) § 2 of the Criminal Code) and sentenced to ten years in prison. 11.

   2.

The applicants alleged a violation of their rights under Article   6   §   1 and Article 8 of the Convention. THE FACTS 2.

Nonobstant toute disposition législative contraire, notamment celles des articles L. 111-3 et L. 112-1-1 du code rural et de la pêche maritime et de l’article L. 512-2 du code de l’environnement, les

and financial circumstances, whether the alleged interference with the defendant’s right to respect for his traditional way of life was justified under Article 8 § 2 of the Convention.