The material before the Court demonstrates that the authorities failed to make any meaningful effort to find and question R. in connection with the first applicant’s complaints.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

On the same day, an expulsion order made by the Prefect of Agrigento was served on the applicant together with an order issued by the Agrigento police commissioner for the applicant’s detention at the

raised in the application has been examined under Article 5 § 3 and there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaint under Article 5 §   5 (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

supervisory review of the judgments, raised in the present applications and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on these additional complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

that the applicants’ complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaints under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

man over 30 years old, is outside of the age group subject to obligatory military service and the partial mobilisation campaign, which took place in the fall of 2022 and affected larger proportion of male

    The applicant is a French citizen who was born in 1963 and lives in Alcira, near Valencia (Spain). 8.     The applicant married in January 1983.

The applicant’s submissions about the absence of such protection in November 2006 were also in contradiction with those she made before the domestic authorities (see paragraph 46 above).

    The Government made comments in reply to the applicants’ original and updated claims for just satisfaction. 28.

    The submissions made by the applicants and the Government were similar to those made by the parties in respect of the same complaint raised in the case of Annagi Hajibeyli v.

medical examinations to be conducted, the applicant had refused to provide the authorities with the histological samples and medical materials in his possession and that the authorities’ attempts to make

With regard to the remainder of their statement, they made the same submissions as those set out in paragraph 9 above. They specifically denied having hit or kicked the applicant. 23 .

    Pursuant to Article 161a of the CCP, witnesses are obliged to appear before the public prosecution office and make a statement.

The applicants made use of that opportunity. Their grievances were reviewed by national courts at two levels of jurisdiction. 51.

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.

When countersigning the arrest records, the applicants had not made any objections to the time and place of arrest indicated therein.

    Later the same day, and before being informed that his conversation with Ms H had been recorded, the applicant was interviewed by DS Valentine at Hampstead Police Station.