CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 010 résultats pour « Pierre Awad »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD004443806

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2011

21 juillet 2011

    The Government maintained that no award should be made under this head because the applicant had not submitted any documents in support of his claims. 78.

Page 51 sur 101

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC2 résultats

Journal officiel
Ventes et cessions

YU CHANG, YACOUB AWAD, Serge Yuan Franck-Pierre, Sabri

SIREN 879820207GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE CRÉTEIL

Acte en date du 29/11/2019 enregistré au SDE DE CRETEIL le 03/12/2019 sous le numéro Dossier 2019 00035694 - référence : 9404P61 2019 A 10963 Adresse de l'ancien propriétaire 18 Avenue Paul Doumer 77500 Chelles

19/12/2019

Voir →

Créations

AWADJ, GOMEZ, Franck, Emmanuel, Pierre

SIREN 522750751GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE PERPIGNAN

26/04/2015

Voir →

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304DEC003723597

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2003

4 mars 2003

On 2 April 1990 the applicants’ lawyers issued a statement deploring the destruction or disappearance of pieces of evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1124JUD001921304

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2011

24 novembre 2011

Ruling on an equitable basis, the Court awards the applicant EUR 10,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. B.     Costs and expenses 96.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0427JUD007360713

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2017

27 avril 2017

    The Court, ruling on an equitable basis, awards the applicant EUR   4,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. B.     Costs and expenses 68.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0129JUD005574908

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2015

29 janvier 2015

Ruling on an equitable basis, the Court awards the applicant EUR   8,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. B.     Costs and expenses 105.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0204JUD003999717

Admin. suprême

4 février 2021

4 février 2021

This is all the more so since the applicant still has those pieces of evidence and the authorities are not entirely deprived of the possibility to have access to them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD001718911

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2020

11 juin 2020

His passport was subsequently taken away by the smugglers. He then travelled onward to Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Russia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607JUD003240110

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2022

7 juin 2022

, and four issues of the Watchtower and Awake! magazines) to be extremist.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD003752216

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2023

14 novembre 2023

After he refused dinner and swallowed two batteries and a piece of a remote control, he was taken to hospital where he refused examination. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD002078914

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2021

10 juin 2021

That conclusion was based on reliable medical evidence which was coherent with other pieces of evidence collected by the domestic authorities.

Source officielle
CA

Chambre 3-4

67ef71748d5c08d4a262e6da

Appel

3 avril 2025

3 avril 2025

MOTIFS Sur la demande de la société Intersteel tendant à faire juger irrecevables et écarter des débats les pièces adverses 20, 22 et 43 : La pièce n°20 est un tableau de répartition des gains et

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303JUD000878202

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2009

3 mars 2009

In 1920 the authorities gave them usufructuary rights to a piece of land located within the administrative division of the town of Kadirli, near Adana.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516DEC002574815

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2017

16 mai 2017

The two eldest had moved away from home. Her children spoke Danish and Bosnian. She did not have a job.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303DEC002474503

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2020

3 mars 2020

Thus, the presence of a shopping centre had been contemplated as part of the overarching plan ( assetto complessivo ) for the entire piece of land that had been subject to expropriation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD001599612

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2021

22 avril 2021

The domestic authorities, having refused to institute a criminal case, had failed to provide a relevant explanation as to why the pieces of evidence in support of the applicant’s claims were considered

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002124905

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

    One of the main pieces of incriminating evidence submitted by the prosecution was a summary of various telephone conversations which had been recorded.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609JUD001773103

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2009

9 juin 2009

    The applicant was the owner of a piece of land in Radomsko. On 12   December   1985 he concluded an arrangement with a co-operative enabling him to begin construction work. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD001321005

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2012

23 octobre 2012

a request for review on the basis of the Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time Act in a case where the domestic proceedings had been pending for a number of years before the introduction of this piece

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317JUD000254119

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2026

17 mars 2026

    The Court notes that when ordering the applicants’ initial and continued pre ‑ trial detention, the judicial authorities cited, in a formulaic manner, numerous pieces of evidence in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1109DEC006013613

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2021

9 novembre 2021

At the same time the experts confirmed that the applicant was addicted to alcohol but was aware of his reactions while he was intoxicated. 12.

Source officielle