CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 012 résultats pour « Mompion »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122223

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2013

3 juin 2013

On 22 September 2010 counsel on behalf of H. lodged a fresh motion with the Regional Court, requesting the court to order the clinic to desist from exercising pressure on H. with the aim of coercing him

Source officielle

Page 51 sur 351

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411JUD000787303

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

On 28 May 2002 the District Court rejected the applicant’s motion for bias. 10.     On 11 September 2003 the District Court acquitted the applicant. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0307DEC003019396

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2000

7 mars 2000

    On 21 May 1991 the applicant, referring to section 28 § 4 of the 1982 Upper Austrian Environmental Protection Act, filed a motion with the Kirchdorf District Court ( Bezirksgericht ).

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:SO01673

Cassation

30 septembre 2014

30 septembre 2014

(secrétaire générale du syndicat Professionnel de la Poste), ne faisant que rapporter les propos de Madame X..., mais n'ayant rien constaté par ellemême ; que seule est produite une motion présentée le

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0719JUD006316013

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2022

19 juillet 2022

Their motions were rejected by domestic courts for two main reasons, that is because the domestic legislation did not require a lawyer’s presence at that particular moment and because these confessions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-140580

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2013

6 novembre 2013

  A division among the suspects’ legal situations appeared to be a proper way of handling a case concerning multiple defendants, so that the prosecutor could submit to the court the motion to place

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC003309903

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2007

2 octobre 2007

    Main proceedings On 1 July 1999 the applicant lodged a motion for the dissolution of a co-ownership with the Łódź District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506DEC000696202

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

On 16 August 1999 the applicant lodged a motion to attach the property of the Regional Police Department of Zaporizzhia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC006113808

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

On 7 December 2009 the assigned judge heard argument on a motion to dismiss on grounds of delay and reserved judgment to 21 December 2009.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116516

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2012

6 décembre 2012

court that determined the applicant’s claim in insolvency proceedings, in which the applicant had been appointed a trustee, on the ground that one of the judges on the bench submitted to the court a motion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111066

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2012

13 avril 2012

In the prosecution’s ensuing motion to have the applicant detained on remand, the dangers of absconding and collusion were referred to.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144829

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2014

30 avril 2014

Instead, the extraordinary review procedure could be initiated either on a prosecutor’s motion or on a motion of the president of a higher court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148860

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2014

17 novembre 2014

On 29 December 2011 the applicant association lodged a constitutional appeal and a motion for review of the constitutionality of Section 16 of the 2006 Act, challenging the EUR 5,000 ceiling.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-153424

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2015

3 mars 2015

applicant had not been able to attend the hearing due to a sudden sickness and had been excused by her representative, the Independent Administrative Panel should have scheduled another hearing of its own motion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1028DEC004491598

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 1999

28 octobre 1999

    A hearing scheduled for 12 January 1998 was adjourned by the District Court of its own motion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1211DEC004077402

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2006

11 décembre 2006

he had not been provided with enough time to study his case-file before the first trial and that he had not been able to contact with his lawyer at the initial stage of the proceedings and that his motions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182160

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2018

12 mars 2018

During the hearings the applicant lodged a number of motions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116757

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2013

21 janvier 2013

Both parties had repeatedly been submitting numerous pleadings and motions which the court was obliged to examine. No delays on the part of the court in examining these motions had been established.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC001221115

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

Besides, such a serious incident should have been investigated effectively by the authorities of their own motion. The Court’s assessment 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120820

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2013

16 mai 2013

On 29 June 2005 the first-instance court, on its own motion, terminated the enforcement ( се запира извршувањето ) and quashed the enforcement measures undertaken ( спроведените извршни дејствија се укинуваат

Source officielle