CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122223
3 juin 2013
On 22 September 2010 counsel on behalf of H. lodged a fresh motion with the Regional Court, requesting the court to order the clinic to desist from exercising pressure on H. with the aim of coercing him
Page 51 sur 351
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411JUD000787303
11 avril 2006
On 28 May 2002 the District Court rejected the applicant’s motion for bias. 10. On 11 September 2003 the District Court acquitted the applicant. 11.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0307DEC003019396
7 mars 2000
On 21 May 1991 the applicant, referring to section 28 § 4 of the 1982 Upper Austrian Environmental Protection Act, filed a motion with the Kirchdorf District Court ( Bezirksgericht ).
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:SO01673
30 septembre 2014
(secrétaire générale du syndicat Professionnel de la Poste), ne faisant que rapporter les propos de Madame X..., mais n'ayant rien constaté par ellemême ; que seule est produite une motion présentée le
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0719JUD006316013
19 juillet 2022
Their motions were rejected by domestic courts for two main reasons, that is because the domestic legislation did not require a lawyer’s presence at that particular moment and because these confessions
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-140580
6 novembre 2013
A division among the suspects’ legal situations appeared to be a proper way of handling a case concerning multiple defendants, so that the prosecutor could submit to the court the motion to place
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC003309903
2 octobre 2007
Main proceedings On 1 July 1999 the applicant lodged a motion for the dissolution of a co-ownership with the Łódź District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506DEC000696202
6 mai 2003
On 16 August 1999 the applicant lodged a motion to attach the property of the Regional Police Department of Zaporizzhia.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC006113808
21 juin 2011
On 7 December 2009 the assigned judge heard argument on a motion to dismiss on grounds of delay and reserved judgment to 21 December 2009.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116516
6 décembre 2012
court that determined the applicant’s claim in insolvency proceedings, in which the applicant had been appointed a trustee, on the ground that one of the judges on the bench submitted to the court a motion
ECLI:CEDH:001-111066
13 avril 2012
In the prosecution’s ensuing motion to have the applicant detained on remand, the dangers of absconding and collusion were referred to.
ECLI:CEDH:001-144829
30 avril 2014
Instead, the extraordinary review procedure could be initiated either on a prosecutor’s motion or on a motion of the president of a higher court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-148860
17 novembre 2014
On 29 December 2011 the applicant association lodged a constitutional appeal and a motion for review of the constitutionality of Section 16 of the 2006 Act, challenging the EUR 5,000 ceiling.
ECLI:CEDH:001-153424
3 mars 2015
applicant had not been able to attend the hearing due to a sudden sickness and had been excused by her representative, the Independent Administrative Panel should have scheduled another hearing of its own motion
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1028DEC004491598
28 octobre 1999
A hearing scheduled for 12 January 1998 was adjourned by the District Court of its own motion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1211DEC004077402
11 décembre 2006
he had not been provided with enough time to study his case-file before the first trial and that he had not been able to contact with his lawyer at the initial stage of the proceedings and that his motions
ECLI:CEDH:001-182160
12 mars 2018
During the hearings the applicant lodged a number of motions.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116757
21 janvier 2013
Both parties had repeatedly been submitting numerous pleadings and motions which the court was obliged to examine. No delays on the part of the court in examining these motions had been established.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC001221115
28 septembre 2021
Besides, such a serious incident should have been investigated effectively by the authorities of their own motion. The Court’s assessment 17.
ECLI:CEDH:001-120820
16 mai 2013
On 29 June 2005 the first-instance court, on its own motion, terminated the enforcement ( се запира извршувањето ) and quashed the enforcement measures undertaken ( спроведените извршни дејствија се укинуваат