CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

88 661 résultats pour « Mady »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109DEC000642705

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2018

9 janvier 2018

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC005216812

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

    The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention about his alleged ill-treatment during police custody on 26 May 2011 (hereinafter “the incident of 26 May 2011”) and the relevant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523JUD000336004

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2006

23 mai 2006

    The applicant made no claim under this head. C.     Default interest 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD003047218

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2022

7 juillet 2022

    In the light of the applicant’s express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the parties may be considered to have reached a friendly settlement. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC006211010

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2012

10 juillet 2012

[S.K.] may regress and her functioning may deteriorate as she becomes more in touch with the damage that has been caused to her.” 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503DEC006212309

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2011

3 mai 2011

Austria , no. 7761/77, Commission decision of 8 May 1978).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC008327517

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2019

3 septembre 2019

Therefore, it is in principle to him or her that payment must be made, unless a special request is made during the proceedings before the Court (as with the case of judgments, see, for example, Denisov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0906JUD000399403

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2007

6 septembre 2007

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kąkol v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004JUD000637908

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

Austria , no. 28571/06, §§ 30-32, 20 May 2010). 32.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126682

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2013

4 septembre 2013

On 7 May 2008 the Vienna Court of Appeal ( Oberlandesgericht Wien ) dismissed the applicant’s appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC001341904

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2011

10 mai 2011

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD004932007

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2012

2 octobre 2012

    There is no information in the case file as to how many hearings in total were held and/or adjourned. 20.     Y and Z died on 19 May 2007 and 14 May 1988, respectively. II.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0628JUD003859714

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2022

28 juin 2022

  Austria , 6 May 1985, §§ 30-35, Series A no. 92, and Letinčić v.   Croatia , no.   7183/11, § 51, 3 May 2016). 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC003238596

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2001

22 mars 2001

Between 20 October 1993 and 23 May 1996, the bailiff made 13 attempts to recover possession, on 20 October 1993, 25 January 1994, 21 April 1994, 20 June 1994, 19 October 1994, 20 January 1995, 23 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD006719917

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2021

19 octobre 2021

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001266187

Admin. suprême

25 février 1993

25 février 1993

In no case may such searches be made during the night. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0728JUD002580394

Admin. suprême

28 juillet 1999

28 juillet 1999

He replied on 23 May 1996. 49.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11078

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2016

10 mai 2016

Furthermore, although the article concerned a topic of public interest in view of the many shootings that had occurred in the area, it could have nevertheless been illustrated in other ways.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-728

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2010

25 novembre 2010

In May 2000 a company rented a flat situated on the ground floor of the building and, without obtaining the requisite permissions, started running a computer club.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD002301915

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2019

29 janvier 2019

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5.

Source officielle

Page 51 sur 4434

← PrécédentSuivant →