AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109DEC000642705
9 janvier 2018
9 janvier 2018
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC005216812
19 septembre 2017
19 septembre 2017
The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention about his alleged ill-treatment during police custody on 26 May 2011 (hereinafter “the incident of 26 May 2011”) and the relevant
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523JUD000336004
23 mai 2006
23 mai 2006
The applicant made no claim under this head. C. Default interest 27.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD003047218
7 juillet 2022
7 juillet 2022
In the light of the applicant’s express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the parties may be considered to have reached a friendly settlement. 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC006211010
10 juillet 2012
10 juillet 2012
[S.K.] may regress and her functioning may deteriorate as she becomes more in touch with the damage that has been caused to her.” 17.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503DEC006212309
3 mai 2011
3 mai 2011
Austria , no. 7761/77, Commission decision of 8 May 1978).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC008327517
3 septembre 2019
3 septembre 2019
Therefore, it is in principle to him or her that payment must be made, unless a special request is made during the proceedings before the Court (as with the case of judgments, see, for example, Denisov
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0906JUD000399403
6 septembre 2007
6 septembre 2007
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kąkol v.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004JUD000637908
4 octobre 2011
4 octobre 2011
Austria , no. 28571/06, §§ 30-32, 20 May 2010). 32.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126682
4 septembre 2013
4 septembre 2013
On 7 May 2008 the Vienna Court of Appeal ( Oberlandesgericht Wien ) dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC001341904
10 mai 2011
10 mai 2011
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD004932007
2 octobre 2012
2 octobre 2012
There is no information in the case file as to how many hearings in total were held and/or adjourned. 20. Y and Z died on 19 May 2007 and 14 May 1988, respectively. II.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0628JUD003859714
28 juin 2022
28 juin 2022
Austria , 6 May 1985, §§ 30-35, Series A no. 92, and Letinčić v. Croatia , no. 7183/11, § 51, 3 May 2016). 17.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC003238596
22 mars 2001
22 mars 2001
Between 20 October 1993 and 23 May 1996, the bailiff made 13 attempts to recover possession, on 20 October 1993, 25 January 1994, 21 April 1994, 20 June 1994, 19 October 1994, 20 January 1995, 23 March
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD006719917
19 octobre 2021
19 octobre 2021
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001266187
25 février 1993
25 février 1993
In no case may such searches be made during the night. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0728JUD002580394
28 juillet 1999
28 juillet 1999
He replied on 23 May 1996. 49.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11078
10 mai 2016
10 mai 2016
Furthermore, although the article concerned a topic of public interest in view of the many shootings that had occurred in the area, it could have nevertheless been illustrated in other ways.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-728
25 novembre 2010
25 novembre 2010
In May 2000 a company rented a flat situated on the ground floor of the building and, without obtaining the requisite permissions, started running a computer club.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD002301915
29 janvier 2019
29 janvier 2019
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5.
Source officiellePage 51 sur 4434