of Cassation: violation Fair hearing Notification of Court of Cassation hearing by announcement at its registry: no violation Refusal of Court of Cassation to put preliminary question to Court of Arbitration

The court’s record of the hearing indicated that prosecutor S. had attended the hearing. The applicant denies the latter information.

The judge postponed the hearing until 30 May 1995.   During that hearing, the defence’s counsel declared that he was on strike and the judge postponed the hearing until 22 September 1995.

December 1970 the main hearing as well as the hearing on the lawfulness of the detention, would take place.   On ..

s interests and to the fact that the Special Prosecutor had been allowed to attend the hearing.

required the hearing to be adjourned.

The court noted that the applicant had been “properly notified of the hearing but had failed to attend it”. No hearing was held since no parties attended.

San Marino - 35396/97 Judgment 8.2.2000 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Oral hearing Lack of oral hearing   before the trial judge: violation Facts : The applicant

Article 301 Arranging a court hearing “5.

At the hearing of 21 October 1999, the applicant requested the court to appoint an interpreter to assist him during the hearings. However, at the following hearing, there was no interpreter.

    The Court reiterates at the outset that the entitlement to a “public hearing” in Article 6 § 1 necessarily implies a right to an “oral hearing”.

    Of fourteen hearings listed between December 2001 and January 2003, one hearing was adjourned because the defendant did not attend, one was postponed due to the judge's illness, three hearings

Seven other witnesses failed to attend the hearing.

He submitted that the record of the hearing had not mentioned exactly when he had returned to the hearing.

However, the hearing had to be adjourned because one of the judges was ill. The presiding judge asked whether the witness would appear at the next hearing.

The court held a new hearing on 4 December 1997 which was adjourned until 27 January 1998 because OZTN failed to attend. On the latter date the heading was cancelled.

Azerbaijan - 38228/05 Judgment 8.10.2009 [Section I] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Failure to notify defendant or his counsel of date of criminal-appeal hearing: violation  

société LEMONNIER, dont le siège social est ... au Mans (Sarthe), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 30 juillet 1986 par la cour d'appel d'Angers (1ère chambre, section A), au profit de la société HELMINGER

reasons against holding a hearing.”