CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD000521706
27 juin 2017
On 18 February 2005 the jury delivered a guilty verdict. 9.
Page 51 sur 692
4ème chambre commerciale
69bd43a7cdc6046d4752f038
18 avril 2025
fond, origine Tribunal de Commerce de NIMES, décision attaquée en date du 17 Novembre 2023, enregistrée sous le n° 2022J00069 Monsieur [E] [B] [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] Représentant : Me Céline GUILLE
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC007552916
25 juin 2019
They relied on Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.” 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC007391116
They relied on Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.”
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1110JUD005757514
10 novembre 2020
After the Court had delivered the above-mentioned judgment, the applicant applied to the domestic courts to have set aside the domestic judgments finding him guilty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD003670512
12 janvier 2017
The District Court was not wrong in believing this witness, who proved the defendant’s guilt of the criminal acts.
civ2
60794bdb9ba5988459c440d0
9 mai 1979
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE, PRIS EN SES DEUX BRANCHES : ATTENDU QU'IL EST FAIT GRIEF A L'ARRET ATTAQUE, QUI A CONFIRME UN JUGEMENT CONDAMNANT GUIDY A PAYER AUX EPOUX X...
Cour d'Appel
6253ca12bd3db21cbdd89f6f
31 janvier 2008
I ZA DE KEREBARS-29820 GUILERS Prévenu, appelant Non comparante, représentée par Maître KERMARREC Michel, avocat au barreau de QUIMPER SARL SOTRA ZA DE KEREBARS-29820 GUILERS Prévenu, appelant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC002137704
18 novembre 2008
On 12 May 1993 the Kırklareli Military Court acquitted the applicant in relation to certain charges and found him guilty as charged for the remaining offences.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC002591406
12 janvier 2010
On 6 November 2000 the District Court found the applicant guilty of unlawful loan operations in a bank he worked in and sentenced him to one year’s correctional labour.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238699
28 novembre 2024
By a final judgment of 25 October 2023, the Supreme Court of Georgia, amending a lower court’s judgment, found the applicants’ stepfather guilty of having committed abuses against the second applicant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC003747597
30 mars 1999
On 9 November 1995 the court-martial found the applicant guilty of four offences contrary to section 69 and of one offence contrary to section 34 of the 1955 Act.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0226DEC000666814
26 février 2019
The second applicant was found guilty of aiding and abetting the offences of abuse of office and forgery of public documents. 8.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C300460
23 mai 2019
à la Société mutuelle d'assurance du bâtiment et des travaux publics (SMABTP), dont le siège est [...] , ayant un établissement secondaire [...] , prise en qualité d'assureur décennal de la société Guillo
Tribunal Administratif de Rennes
ORTA_2507723_20251119
19 novembre 2025
B..., représentée par Me Caroline Guil, demande au juge des référés : 1°) d’enjoindre au préfet du Finistère, sur le fondement de l’article L. 521-2 du code de justice administrative, de l’orienter
ECLI:CEDH:001-115429
20 novembre 2012
On 19 October 2006 the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Izhevsk found the applicant guilty of aggravated theft and sentenced him to six years of imprisonment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD000319820
22 janvier 2026
judgment had been delivered; no suspensive effect of appeal 7,500 25500/20 24/06/2020 Murat Osmanovich DASKIYEV 1949 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow The applicant was found guilty
ECLI:CEDH:001-206179
20 octobre 2020
Mr Shadrin pleaded not guilty. He stressed that he had not used any profane words to refer to President Putin.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1204JUD001641206
4 décembre 2014
It was indicated that she had pleaded guilty to that charge. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0131JUD001823211
31 janvier 2017
Mr Aslanyan further complained that in the course of reviewing his detention on remand, on 4 September 2013, the Oktyabrskiy District Court had declared him guilty before his guilt had been proved