Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary

The relevant part of Article 3 of Protocol   No. 1 reads as follows: “The High Contracting Parties undertake to hold free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which

. # Free movement of doctors - Numerus clausus for medical faculties. # Joined cases 98, 162 and 258/85.

#Free movement of goods - Charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty - Services rendered simultaneously to several undertakings - Payment of an amount disproportionate to the cost of the service

#Franco-Spanish Convention on the protection of indications of provenance and designations of origin - Compatibility with the rules on the free movement of goods.#Case C-3/91.

#Freedom to provide services - Free movement of capital - National legislation designed to preserve a pluralistice and non-commercial broadccasting network.#Case C-148/91.

Fraefel, a lawyer practising in Bern.         The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.     A.

FREE MOBILE [Adresse 6] [Localité 4] Représentées par la SELARL BDL AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P0480 Assistées de Me Elsa THAUVIN de l'AARPI FREGET GLASER & ASSOCIES, avocat plaidant

Me Laurence TAZE BERNARD, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P0241 Assistée à l'audience de Me Martin LE TOUZÉ et Me César MICHEL, avocats au barreau de PARIS, toque J033 du cabinet HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des mémoires, enregistrés le 4 juillet 2022, le 2 janvier 2024 et le 3 mars 2025, la société par actions simplifiées (SAS) Free Mobile, représentée par Me

Julien Fradel, maître des requêtes en service extraordinaire, - les conclusions de M. Raphaël Chambon, rapporteur public ; Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

paritaire du MANS, décision attaquée en date du 19 Octobre 2011, enregistrée sous le no 10/ 00684 APPELANTE : Madame Danielle X... ... 72100 LE MANS représentée par Maître Daniel FROESSEL

It noted that he could not afford one, but held that the interests of justice did not require that he be provided with free legal assistance, as he held a university degree and the charges against him

2014 were held under the same regulatory framework which the European Court found to be discriminatory; 2. encouraged therefore the authorities and political leaders of Bosnia and Herzegovina to give a fresh

Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 provides: “The High Contracting Parties undertake to hold free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of

Violation of Article 14+P1-3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election;Right to free elections-{general});Violation of Article 1 of

#Free movement of goods - Articles 30 and 36 of the Treaty and industrial and commercial property - Common organization of the market and intervention by Member States.#Case 16/83.

Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+P1-3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general};Stand for election);Pecuniary