#xa0; September 1996, in accordance with Article   32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicants as just satisfaction, within three months, 60 000 French

, in   accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 20 000 French

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 15 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 75 000 French francs and that interest should be payable on any non-paid sum

francs in respect of pecuniary damage and 60 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses and that simple interest at an annual rate of 3.36% would be payable on those sums from the expiry of the

(The judgment is available only in French.)     (3)     Durand v. France (no. 41449/98)   Violation Article 6 § 1 (4)     Durand (2) v.

  On 19 September 1989 an airliner operated by the French airline UTA exploded over the Ténéré desert following a bomb attack in which 170 people, including Ms Castelanu d'Essenault's sister and a

le 4 mai 1990 par la cour d'appel de Paris (7e Chambre, Section B) et de l'arrêt rendu le 14 février 1992 par la cour d'appel de Paris (7e Chambre, Section B), au profit : 1 ) de la société Anglo French

campement qui s'étendait également sur la parcelle située 121 rue d'Alger ; des dégradations et des vols de matériaux ont été constatés sur la parcelle voisine située 121 rue d'Alger qui accueille une friche

the report drawn up on 28 February 1998 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 19   July 1993 by   French

(The judgment is available only in French.)

d’annuler la décision en date du 11 mars 2025 par laquelle la directrice des finances publiques de la Haute-Vienne a rejeté sa réclamation portant sur une demande de dégrèvement de la taxe sur les friches

the case originated in an application (No. 41715/98) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 9 June 1998 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Hocine Kadri, a French

originated in an application (No. 39523/98) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 24 December 1997 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Lucien Bouriau, a French

case originated in an application (No. 34206/96) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 1 October 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Jaime Serra, a French

application (No. 39066/97) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 14 August 1997 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr   Jean ‑ Pierre Donnadieu, a French

originated in an application (No. 39615/98) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 10 December 1997 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Ms Liliane Motière, a French

However, they asked the Algerian authorities to give certain undertakings: that they would fulfil their obligation to hold a fresh trial with the applicant being present and with due respect for the rights

originated in an application (No. 41333/98) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 10 February 1998 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Claude Brochu, a French