;   Reviewing the facts of the present cases in the light of those principles, the Court considers that the authorities, who were empowered to open and conduct a criminal investigation, did not make

Lastly, he complained that the police made no attempt to contact him on that day to secure his presence. 13 .

(“the applicant”), who was born in 1943, lives in Baia   Mare and was represented by Ms Ş.R.

that the applicant’s complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaint under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Moldovan national, Mr Valentin

On 7 August 2017 the Karşıyaka enforcement judge dismissed the objection on the grounds that the Administration and Observation Board’s decision was in accordance with the law and regulations and was made

    The Court cannot speculate as to the merits of the defence the applicants could have relied on had they had an opportunity to make targeted submissions on the offence of abuse of office of

Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the victim made

    However, reference will still be made to the “first applicant” throughout the ensuing text. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 of protocol no. 1 to the convention 11.

Hunedoara County Police Station, Aiud, Baia   Mare and Bârcea   Mare (Deva) Prisons 28/01/2014 to 14/02/2017 3 year(s) and 18 day(s) 1.57-2.71   m² overcrowding (save for 28/01/2014-27/

Prisons 29/10/2018 pending More than 7 year(s)     9846/23 20/04/2023 Alexandru GASPAR 2000 Gherla, Aiud, Bacău and Baia Mare Prisons 18/12/2019 pending More than 5 year(s) and 10 month(s) and

They are the wife and daughter of Valentin Moiseyev, who was also an applicant before the Court (application no.62936/00).

It thus considers that the applicant’s remaining complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on them (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the applicant and that there is no need to examine these complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

They developed a procedural action plan, made two photofit pictures of the alleged perpetrators, and questioned twenty-seven metro employees and one witness, who confirmed that he had seen the applicant

    Moreover, the Government submitted that those amendments had been superfluous and had simply made explicit what had supposedly been the state of the domestic law even before their enactment

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

satisfaction), no. 25701/94, § 72, 28   November   2002) according to which a judgment in which it finds a breach imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation to put an end to the breach and make