CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD005921411
26 juin 2012
for the resumption of the investigation, a repeated motion for resumption on the same ground shall not be allowed.”
Page 50 sur 351
Pôle 5 - Chambre 9
69e072facdc6046d47694648
15 avril 2026
Le 4 avril 2025, la SAS Kitsuné Creative a régularisé, devant les juridictions New-Yorkaises, une « motion to dismiss » afin de contester la compétence de la SDNY pour statuer sur les demandes de M.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD001001710
10 octobre 2013
On 5 March 2009 the applicants lodged a motion for a deadline with the Ljubljana Higher Court. 11.
Tribunal Administratif de Limoges
DTA_2500755_20250812
12 août 2025
Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 2 juin 2025, la commune d'Oradour-sur-Glane, représentée par Me Monpion, déclare ne pas s'opposer à la demande d'expertise, formule les protestations et réserves
2ème chambre
DTA_2101801_20231214
14 décembre 2023
complémentaires enregistrées les 13 et 16 juillet 2021, ainsi qu'un mémoire enregistré le 15 novembre 2022 qui n'a pas été communiqué, la société civile immobilière (SCI) de Landrevie, représentée par Me Monpion
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC003138402
11 septembre 2007
On 31 May 2005 the court rejected the applicant’s motion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130DEC002590394
30 novembre 1999
Moreover, on 10 November 1995, the applicant filed a motion challenging Judge A.E. for bias.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC003338907
14 janvier 2014
Pre-trial statements of a victim or a witness, who is absent during the trial, may be read out in the court upon the motion of one of the parties or upon the own motion of the court (Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130DEC002886895
And on 10 November 1995, the applicant had filed a motion challenging Judge A.E. for bias.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD003591502
24 novembre 2005
On 30 April 1999 the applicant filed a motion for withdrawal of the first-instance judge.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0309DEC005522800
9 mars 2004
On 24 November 2000 the Supreme Court rejected the applicants' motion that another court be appointed to hear the case. On 20 March 2001 the District Court held a hearing.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0908DEC002058092
8 septembre 1992
His motion was dismissed by the 29th Chamber at the Court of Appeal on 22 March 1989.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1127DEC002878002
27 novembre 2006
On 29-30 May 2003 the court examined the applicant’s motions and adjourned the hearing till 27 June 2003. The next hearing was scheduled for 26 August 2003.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0308DEC000803602
8 mars 2007
At the hearings held on 6 May 1999 and 1 June 1999 the Adana State Security Court examined the case file on its own motion and, in view of the state of evidence and the seriousness of the charges, decided
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1005JUD006476401
5 octobre 2004
On 28 March 1991 the applicant lodged a motion with the Oleśno District Court, claiming a division of inheritance and dissolution of co-ownership of a certain property. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122JUD004493607
22 janvier 2013
On 23 January 2001 the applicants’ motion for the disqualification of a judge was dismissed. 12. On 14 May 2003 the District Court gave a partial judgment.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202DEC000054610
2 décembre 2014
On 26 November 2008 the Federal Court of Justice refused to grant legal aid for the applicant’s motion for leave to appeal ( Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde ).
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140566
6 novembre 2013
A division among the suspects’ legal situations appeared to be a proper way of handling a case concerning multiple defendants, so that the prosecutor could submit to the court the motion to place
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC000699211
26 mars 2019
On an unknown date in 2010 the Warsaw Governor instituted of its own motion proceedings seeking to have the decision of 12 November 1997 declared null and void ( postępowanie nadzorcze ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1210JUD005679515
10 décembre 2024
In its view, the administrative courts were not obliged to investigate of their own motion whether criminal judgments had become irrevocable, if this was not clear from the documents in the file.