Furthermore, in many cells, there were not enough beds and prisoners had to share them or sleep in turns.

In its decision the Supreme Court stated as follows: “The Supreme Court agrees that presumably the non-edited recordings and the notes made by the journalist JB may assist the investigation and production

On 23 May 2002 Mr A. registered ownership rights thereto.

Both applications were dismissed by the Federal Court on 6   May 1999. The judgments were served on the applicant’s lawyer on 19   May 1999.

       On 24 May 1994 a report was brought to the attention of Dr.

No charges were made against any other police officers.

be made”.

Between 14 May and 4 December 1997 he made 26 such applications and appealed against each refusal. The courts reiterated the grounds they had previously given for his continued detention.

The facts of the case, as they have been submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.   A.

On 8 June 1999 that court made an order to that effect and the applicant was set free on 10 June 1999. B.     The applicant’s alleged ill ‑ treatment between 28 and 31 May 1999 8 .

In May 2001 Mr   Köck co-founded a private investment company whose purpose was to take over and run hospitals with a view to maximising their potential.

The applicant made written representations against the order on 23 May 1993. Although the applicant was out of time, the Secretary of State nominated an Adviser to interview him.

Many houses, private homes as well as public buildings, were damaged and some villagers were injured, including the head of the village. 5.

Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial.” 8.

Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial.” 7.

Between 2 May 1995 and 5 November 1997, the bailiff made six attempts to recover possession.

  The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

              JUDGMENT (Revision)               STRASBOURG   17 July 2018       This judgment is final but it may

In addition, no catering arrangements were made on the days when the applicant was studying the case file.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Pleş v.