The applicant’s claim was granted at first instance in line with the applicable labour law and collective agreements, but the judgment was reversed on appeal on the grounds that accepting the applicant

S.L. against Spain lodged on 23 September 2025 communicated on 5 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged failure to summon the applicant company in the framework of labour

adequate number of in-house lawyers on its staff who, instead of an externally hired advocate, could have effectively represented the municipality’s interests in court in those not particularly complex labour

the provisions of Article 98 of Law no. 188/1999 on the status of civil servants, allowing continuation of work beyond retirement age if the employer agreed, as well as on Article 56 § 1 (c) of the Labour

On 18 November 2008 the Budapest Labour Court dismissed the applicant’s action (32.M.220/2006/54).

Some people applied to the prosecutor’s office of the Leninskiy District, some went to the courts and the labour inspection of the Rostov Region.

    The case concerns labour litigation and a subsequent set of review proceedings in which the applicant challenged a declaration of her incapacity.

    On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts

    On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts

The agreement concerned the outstanding legal fees stemming from the labour courts' judgments.

T. claiming compensation for negligence in the context of the above labour court proceedings.

    The applicants challenged the Institute’s decisions in the Ljubljana Labour and Social Court.

  On 15 June 1993 the applicant appealed to the Labour Court (Arbetsdomstolen).

Moreover, if the applicant’s would-be labour action had been pending at the material time, the labour court would have had the duty – in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of 6 May 2011

However, he was not served with a written notice of dismissal or any reasons for termination of his employment, as required under the rules of the Labour Act.

  The applicant complains that he was forced to perform compulsory labour in breach of Article 4 of the Convention, which reads:     “2.

és Közszolgálati Dolgozók Szakszervezete ), decided to organise a strike seeking a number of measures to improve their working conditions, pay and pension rights and the establishment of a national labour

dont le siège est la Pince, route de Magescq à Saint-Paul les Dax (Landes), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 17 décembre 1992 par la cour d'appel de Pau (1ère chamvre), au profit de la société anonyme Laboile-Liegisol

    The applicants lodged complaints against the midwives and doctors who had been involved in the prenatal care, labour and delivery. 12.