CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

23 798 résultats pour « Held Sutter »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56097

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2002

24 juin 2002

brought before the Court by the applicant on 20 January 1999 under Protocol No. 9 and by the Government of the respondent State on 1 April 1999; Whereas in its judgment of 27 June 2000 the Court: - held

Source officielle

Page 50 sur 1190

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55739

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1997

15 mai 1997

that there has been a breach of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention;   – held that it is unnecessary to consider the case under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   – held that this judgment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55509

Admin. suprême

13 mai 1991

13 mai 1991

with Article 14 (art. 14+P1-1) of the Convention;   -        held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;   - &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56214

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 3, of the Convention; - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held that the present judgment constituted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56180

Admin. suprême

24 février 2003

24 février 2003

that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held that it was not necessary to examine the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention; - held that the government of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD007444812

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2014

18 septembre 2014

    The next hearing was held on 23 November 2005, where the trial court heard evidence from M.N.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1028JUD003665005

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2010

28 octobre 2010

Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110002

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2012

26 janvier 2012

The two reports were forwarded by the head of the investigative and monitoring department of the PDO to the head of the investigative department of the Ministry of Prisons in support of a request to take

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1057505-1100752

Admin. suprême

29 juillet 2004

29 juillet 2004

It accordingly held that there was no need to examine that complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0115JUD003746905

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2008

15 janvier 2008

    W.C. was heard again at the hearing held on 18 November 2003.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150502

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2014

8 décembre 2014

In the summer of 2002 she obtained residency and in September 2007 refugee status.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1031JUD000457803

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2006

31 octobre 2006

    On 21 May 1999 the Regional Court held a hearing and appointed an expert. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD000002203

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2009

9 avril 2009

    The trial was held on 12 November 2001.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427JUD003881197

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2004

27 avril 2004

At the hearing held on 1   December   1995 the court ordered that an expert opinion be obtained. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD002976502

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2007

27 novembre 2007

    On 14 May 2003 the İzmir Magistrates' Court held a preparatory hearing and included the case in its list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55866

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2000

29 mai 2000

  held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 5, of the Convention; -   held, unanimously, that it was not necessary also to consider the case under Article 13

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155936

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2015

10 juin 2015

It held that Mr Dzhabarov had failed to prove that he had suffered non-pecuniary damage – such as negative emotions, mental suffering, stress or discomfort – as a result of his detention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2294564-2474123

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2008

20 mars 2008

The ensuing medical report recorded that he had a head wound, concussion, temporary blindness, fractured ribs and bruising around the liver, kidneys and bladder.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD002238503

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2011

19 avril 2011

, the sub ‑ headline “Four experts and a doctor sacked over bribes?”

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2792801-3069636

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2009

16 juillet 2009

It held further that it was unnecessary to examine the complaints based on Articles   8 and   13.

Source officielle