CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56097
24 juin 2002
brought before the Court by the applicant on 20 January 1999 under Protocol No. 9 and by the Government of the respondent State on 1 April 1999; Whereas in its judgment of 27 June 2000 the Court: - held
Page 50 sur 1190
ECLI:CEDH:001-55739
15 mai 1997
that there has been a breach of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; – held that it is unnecessary to consider the case under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1; – held that this judgment
ECLI:CEDH:001-55509
13 mai 1991
with Article 14 (art. 14+P1-1) of the Convention; - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention; - &
ECLI:CEDH:001-56214
24 avril 2003
that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 3, of the Convention; - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held that the present judgment constituted
ECLI:CEDH:001-56180
24 février 2003
that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held that it was not necessary to examine the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention; - held that the government of
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD007444812
18 septembre 2014
The next hearing was held on 23 November 2005, where the trial court heard evidence from M.N.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1028JUD003665005
28 octobre 2010
Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs. 3.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110002
26 janvier 2012
The two reports were forwarded by the head of the investigative and monitoring department of the PDO to the head of the investigative department of the Ministry of Prisons in support of a request to take
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1057505-1100752
29 juillet 2004
It accordingly held that there was no need to examine that complaint.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0115JUD003746905
15 janvier 2008
W.C. was heard again at the hearing held on 18 November 2003.
ECLI:CEDH:001-150502
8 décembre 2014
In the summer of 2002 she obtained residency and in September 2007 refugee status.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1031JUD000457803
31 octobre 2006
On 21 May 1999 the Regional Court held a hearing and appointed an expert. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD000002203
9 avril 2009
The trial was held on 12 November 2001.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427JUD003881197
27 avril 2004
At the hearing held on 1 December 1995 the court ordered that an expert opinion be obtained. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD002976502
27 novembre 2007
On 14 May 2003 the İzmir Magistrates' Court held a preparatory hearing and included the case in its list.
ECLI:CEDH:001-55866
29 mai 2000
held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 5, of the Convention; - held, unanimously, that it was not necessary also to consider the case under Article 13
ECLI:CEDH:001-155936
10 juin 2015
It held that Mr Dzhabarov had failed to prove that he had suffered non-pecuniary damage – such as negative emotions, mental suffering, stress or discomfort – as a result of his detention.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2294564-2474123
20 mars 2008
The ensuing medical report recorded that he had a head wound, concussion, temporary blindness, fractured ribs and bruising around the liver, kidneys and bladder.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD002238503
19 avril 2011
, the sub ‑ headline “Four experts and a doctor sacked over bribes?”
ECLI:CEDH:003-2792801-3069636
16 juillet 2009
It held further that it was unnecessary to examine the complaints based on Articles 8 and 13.