As a result, Mr Gurashvili (“the second applicant”) gave a self-incriminatory statement and was released on 17 December 2004, while Mr Kikilashvili (“the first applicant”) refused to plead guilty and was

[X] [Y] TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DES SABLES D’OLONNE ORDONNANCE DE REFERE DU 10 AVRIL 2026 DEMANDEURS Monsieur [O] [B], demeurant [Adresse 1] représenté par Me Pierre-yves LE GUILLY, avocat au barreau

By a judgment of 26 August 2009 the Sisak County Court ( Županijski sud u Sisku ) found him guilty as charged and sentenced him to nine years’ imprisonment.

KRPELÍK against the Czech Republic lodged on 30 April 2021 communicated on 12 December 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the criminal proceedings in which the applicant was found guilty

In the domestic criminal proceedings, which underpinned the applicant’s initial application, he had been found guilty of theft and had been sentenced to seven months in prison, suspended for three years

rapporteur in the proceedings against G.S and that the Regional Court’s judgment convicting G.S. had contained numerous references to the applicant as well as findings which prejudged the question of her guilt

.) - 43699/13 Decision 6.10.2015 [Section V] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Assize court judgment containing statement of reasons for jury’s guilty verdict: inadmissible Facts

They were found guilty of, among other things, laundering money through fictitious loan agreements concluded before the first applicant in his capacity as a notary public.

B. had already been found guilty at a separate trial and sentenced to imprisonment.

of soldiers found guilty of murder: inadmissible   The applicant is the mother of a young man who was shot dead by two soldiers serving in the British army.

– stated, in particular, that the mayor had been found guilty of an attempt by local government officials to take over a private company.

The applicant immediately filed an application for release, arguing that there were no serious indications of guilt, as required by Article 273 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

On 8 December 2009 the Kyiv Regional Court of Appeal, sitting as a court of first instance, found the applicant guilty of aggravated murder and sentenced him to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 2 août 2024, Mme D B, représentée par Me Guillier, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 2 juillet 2024 par lequel la préfète de

By a judgment delivered after a public, adversarially conducted trial, the Tribunal de Corts found the applicant guilty of misappropriating public funds and forging official documents, and sentenced him

He is after all innocent until proved guilty and he is in a vulnerable situation.

Thus, according to the Court of Criminal Appeal, A.F.’s testimony was enough to conclude that the applicant was guilty of simulation of offence.

The Supreme Court concluded that the applicant was guilty, and sentenced him to one year’s imprisonment.