CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

15 653 résultats pour « Frech »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51742

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2000

10 avril 2000

  accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay to each applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 20 000 French

Source officielle

Page 50 sur 783

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC1 542 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

FRECHE DATA Consulting

SIREN 909384760Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de lyon

27/08/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

FRECH FERMETURES

SIREN 827732975Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de colmar

20/08/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

Cabinet de Neurochirurgie du Docteur Frechon

SIREN 935130500Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de caen

11/08/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

Frech Holding

SIREN 834666596Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de paris

09/08/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

ETS FRECHOT

SIREN 426820262Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques d'auxerre

05/08/2026

Voir →

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49424

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 1995

11 septembre 1995

Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 25 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1156

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2010

5 janvier 2010

The first interview with the Swedish Customs was held in French by a customs officer, who subsequently gave evidence against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55573

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 1993

9 novembre 1993

Recalling that the case originated in an application against France lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 28 September 1987 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Miss B., a French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50502

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1997

15 mai 1997

Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14218

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2023

4 septembre 2023

As to the applicants’ particular circumstances, the Conseil d’État found: – that they had French nationality and had no links with Spain; and that their requests for authorisation to move their gametes

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68134-68602

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2000

30 mai 2000

  Summary of the facts   In April 1977 Mr Krombach married his second wife, a French national who had two children from a previous marriage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11707

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2017

13 juin 2017

peaceful assembly Facts – The applicant, an Algerian national who was born before his country’s independence and lawfully resident in France since 1967, applied in 2009 for the reinstatement of his French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51134

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 55 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50504

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1997

15 mai 1997

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 3 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 23   000 French francs and that interest should be payable on any unpaid

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14226

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2023

4 septembre 2023

As to the applicants’ particular circumstances, the Conseil d’État found: – that they had French nationality and had no links with Spain; and that their requests for authorisation to move their gametes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49623

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 1995

20 novembre 1995

decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant's widow as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49595

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1995

19 octobre 1995

Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50851

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 1997

29 octobre 1997

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 15 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 65 000 French francs and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated

Source officielle
CA

Avis

CADA:20163857

Appel

6 octobre 2016

6 octobre 2016

sur le projet d'aménagement ; 2) la délibération motivée du conseil municipal visant à solliciter l'avis de France Domaine sur les conditions juridiques et financières du projet d'acquisition de la friche

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218392

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2022

15 juin 2022

Subsequently, the French authorities issued a location and judicial return order concerning the second applicant, with a view to the execution of the decision of 11 December.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50676

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 1997

17 septembre 1997

adopted on 15 May 1996, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 25 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50500

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1997

15 mai 1997

decision adopted on 22 March 1996, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 45 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50649

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 1997

11 juillet 1997

28   January 1997, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 25 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-84517

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2007

19 décembre 2007

accordance with former Article   32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 30   000 French

Source officielle