He was charged with unregistered business activity (Article 192 of the Criminal Code), tax fraud (Article 213 of the Criminal Code) and forgery of official documents (Article 320 of the Criminal Code).

The case concerns criminal proceedings for forgery brought against him in October 1998. In a judgment of 21 June 2004 the Gaziantep Assize Court acquitted him.

Subsequently, the public prosecutor maintained that, as the applicant’s acts might constitute a breach of Article   342 of the Criminal Code regulating the offence of forgery, permission to prosecute

N° 2019/ JLT/FP-D Rôle N° RG 18/11414 - N° Portalis DBVB-V-B7C-BCXUA [M] [V] C/ SASU EUROVIA MEDITERRANEE Copie exécutoire délivrée le :23 MAI 2019 à : Me Claudia FORGIONE

    On 10 October 1991 the Benevento Public Prosecutor’s Office requested that the applicant and six other persons be committed for trial on charges of abuse of public authority, forgery and

Ils précisent que l'article 7 des status de la SDF stipule expressément que seuls les honoraires perçus par chaque associé à l'occasion de son exercice professionnel formeront masse commune, c'est-à-dire

He was also arrested in January 2003 on charges of unlawful possession of arms and forgery for which he was subsequently convicted and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment.

May 2001 the Supreme Court replied that the examination carried out at the Chelyabinsk Regional Court had revealed that the 27-page version of the judgment had not been signed by the judge and was a forgery

January 1987 at 14.00 hours after which it ordered that the applicant be detained on the grounds that he was reasonably suspected of using false documents, falsification of documents, embezzlement and forgery

In February 1993 criminal investigations were instituted against the applicant on charges of embezzlement and forgery of documents.

  In 1998 criminal proceedings were brought against the applicant for tax evasion, forgery and uttering forgeries.

September 2011 the Vukovar County State Attorney’s Office ( Županijsko državno odvjetništvo u Vukovaru ) indicted the applicant and four other persons on charges of the abuse of power and authority, forgery

The applicant was also found guilty of forgery and received an overall sentence of seven years and four months of imprisonment.

In 2001-2003 several sets of criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicants, in particular, on suspicion of public funds embezzlement, abuse of office, forgery of official documents and tax

brought by Abdullah Yücel and others, concerned compensation for expropriated property; and the third application concerned criminal proceedings brought against Hakkı Nazsız for alleged bribery and forgery

The Court was also informed that on 1 March 2012 criminal proceedings had been instituted as to the forgery of the abovementioned documents.

repeatedly or by a group of persons), 309.2 (exceeding official authority, with use or threat of use of force, or with use of weapons or other special means, or resulting in serious consequences) and 313 (forgery

directly: inadmissible In a judgment in absentia delivered in May 1995, the Bellinzona Assize Court sentenced the applicant to three years’ imprisonment coupled with a ten-year exclusion order for fraud, forgery

On 26 November 1999 the police started criminal proceedings against Mr Lyzlov on charges of fraud and forgery of documents.