This was because it treated civil servants differently on grounds of age and sex with regard to terminating an employment contract owing to the fulfilment of statutorily determined retirement conditions

The shower could be used only once a week for twenty minutes, while the detainees also had to wash their clothes because there was no hot water in the cells. There was no privacy during the shower.

However, that hearing was adjourned because the parties defaulted.

He was housed in a single room, which he needed because it allowed him to control electronic devices using his voice and gave him the privacy needed for personal hygiene. 4 .

The applicant used to work as a teacher but because of excessive drinking he was diagnosed with alcoholic dementia. He owns a flat in Prague where he lives on his own.

    The Government submit that the applicant has failed to exhaust domestic remedies because his constitutional claim is still pending.

He further complained that he had been discriminated against based on his employment status because had he not been employed his pension would be higher.

She says that she did not tell about the incidents sooner because she was afraid, because her safety and the safety of her family members were threatened.”

The Supreme Court rejected the applicant’s arguments that he had been unlawfully fined because he had allegedly failed to raise these issues before the first instance court.

    By a decision of 1 February 2011, which became final on 2 March 2011, these proceedings were discontinued because the debt had been paid in full.

On   14   January   2013 the criminal proceedings were terminated because of the lack of corpus delicti .

A.U. did not see how the applicant’s arrest had been completed or how he had been taken to the police car because that had been done by M.B.

It was established that his participation in the proceedings could not be secured because he was serving a prison sentence in Slovenia and as such was out of the Croatian authorities’ reach. 15.

His claim for widows' benefits was made on 22 December 1998 and was rejected on 23 February 1999 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows' benefits because he was not a woman.

His second claim for widows' benefits was made on 11 May 2000 and was rejected on 24 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows' benefits because he was not a woman.

The prosecutor’s office stated that it was intervening on behalf of the defendants because they were pensioners and were in a difficult financial situation.

, and of Article 6 (right to a fair hearing) because of the excessive length of the proceedings before the domestic courts.

A lawyer representing one of the other convicted persons submitted that the proceedings had been unfair because the victims of the crime had been questioned at the investigation stage by a court inferior

Subsequently, he had received threatening letters from these men who had considered him a traitor because his father had been Hutu (his mother was Tutsi) and his house had been attacked.

On 8 January 2007 the Administrative Court, referring to its case-law in similar cases, dismissed the request for legal aid because of lack of prospect of success.