Section 67 provides that the proceedings for the protection of constitutional rights and freedoms, if they have been violated by an unlawful act of a State official and if there is no other remedy, are

  Third, it is said that there was no evidence that he knew of the quantity involved.

First, the court found that there was nothing to show that the applicant had in fact, as she had claimed, noticed that she had been under surveillance, which in the court’s view was a necessary condition

According to the Memorial HRC staff in Grozny they found two witnesses who reported that they had seen Ms Natalia Estemirova being pushed into a white car (a VAZ-2107).

Nevertheless, there were no indications that it had been clear to the prosecuting authorities or to the district court that the stepfather’s act was not covered by the provision on sexual molestation.

The court granted the request and ordered that the opinion be submitted no later than 1 October 2004.

It also claimed that the expropriation proceedings, and the amount of compensation paid to it more than 30   years after they had started, had violated the company’s rights under Article   1

They noted that that award had to be added to the previous awards of more than EUR   67,000.

Thierry, conseiller rapporteur, MM. Renard-Payen, Chartier, Ancel, Durieux, conseillers, MM. Savatier, Bignon, conseillers référendaires, M.

During their stay there the applicants left the families and reported to the Austrian police alleging that they had been subject to human trafficking and forced labour.

against him; under Article 6 § 3 (d), that, as a result of the delay, key prosecution evidence was lost and that there was a lack of evidence against him other than questionable police interviews; under

The time-limit of thirty days was, in principle, a reasonable one, and there was an extraordinary extension of fifteen days in situations where it was impossible to lodge the appeal within the normal deadline

Thierry Y..., domicilié [...]                                    , 3°/ à M. Pascal Y..., domicilié [...]                           , 4°/ à M.

They further maintained that the applicant had not challenged the alleged inactivity of the State Bailiffs’ Service and had not claimed relevant compensation before the domestic courts.

The Court observes that there is no indication in this case that the defendant alleged that the limitation period had elapsed.

It also claims that the expropriation proceedings, and the amount of compensation paid to it more than 30 years after they had started, had violated the company’s rights under Article   1 of Protocol

They also considered that he had lost victim status and had abused the right of application.

; Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 20 March 1991 by Mr Thierry