Philip Leach et Bill Bowring, avocats du Centre européen pour la protection des droits de l’homme à Londres («   EHRAC   »).

its decision, the Assize Court stressed that; “ Having regard to the fact that, in the present case, by taking into consideration the quality and nature of the offence imputed to the accused Mehmet Osman

It is represented before the Court by the firm of Philip O’Sullivan & Co., Tralee, Co. Kerry.

its decision, the Assize Court stressed that; “ Having regard to the fact that, in the present case, by taking into consideration the quality and nature of the offence imputed to the accused Mehmet Osman

Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 11 October 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Serghides, President,   Erik Wennerström,   Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having regard to: the applications (nos.

    The applicants were advised by leading Counsel, Mr Philip Engelman Q.C., in March 1996 with regard to liability and quantum.

In giving judgment, Lord Phillips found that the local authority had not entered into any walkways agreement with the company within the meaning of section 18(1) of the Highways Act 1971 (later replaced

    The applicants were represented by Professor Kevin Boyle and Professor Françoise Hampson, succeeded by MM Timothy Otty and Philip Leach, lawyers practising in the United Kingdom, assisted

  Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 49-55, ECHR 2004 ‑ XI; Osman v. the United Kingdom , 28 October 1998, §§ 115-22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ VIII; and Yaşa v.