Appendix         Avag GEVORGYAN is an Armenian national who was born in 1958 and lives in Halidzor village     Arshaluys MINASYAN is an Armenian national

    Reviewing these complaints in the light of the principles established in its case-law (see, as a recent authority, Makuchyan and Minasyan v.   Azerbaijan and Hungary , no.

demeurant [Adresse 3] représentée par Me Virginie Levasseur, avocat au barreau de Douai, avocat constitué assistée de Me Nicolas Vanden Bossche, avocat plaidant, substitué à l'audience par Me Salomé Minassian

Minasyan, a lawyer practising in Yerevan. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Cette conclusion rend superflu l’examen des autres exigences de cette disposition (voir, par exemple, Minasyan et Semerjyan c. Arménie , n o 27651/05, § 76, 23   juin 2009). 58 .

width:189.76pt; display:inline-block } .sAE540E25 { width:21.87pt; display:inline-block } .s7DB8BC41 { width:183.09pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 44837/08 by Vardan MINASYAN

  43606/04, § 69, 23 October 2012; and Makuchyan and Minasyan v.   Azerbaijan and Hungary , no. 17247/13, §§   154-155, 26 May 2020; see also Razzakov v. Russia , no.

bringing the Court of Cassation’s attention to such delay, which constituted valid grounds for the ex jure restoration of the time-limit – even where no explicit request was lodged to that effect (see Minasyan

:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 240 May 2020 Makuchyan and Minasyan

    In the light of the principles established in its case-law (see, as a recent authority,   Makuchyan and Minasyan v.   Azerbaijan and Hungary , no.

  Lithuania , no. 54917/13, §   85, 16 October 2018; and Makuchyan and Minasyan v. Azerbaijan and Hungary , no. 17247/13, § 50, 26 May 2020).

Moreover, as regards the procedural obligation to investigate a death which has occurred outside a State’s jurisdiction, the Court has recently summarised the relevant principles in Makuchyan and Minasyan

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-35, 23 June 2009). 2.

Ignatyev Yuriy Ivanovich 1951 2 700 € 5951/07 Khaliullin Rakip Gabdulkhayevich 1949 2 700 € 31624/07 Nasilnikov Ivan Ivanovich 1950 2 700 € 31698/07 Neznanov Anatoliy Aleksandrovich 1957 2 050 € 51340/07 Minasyan

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-43, 23   June 2009). B.

(f)     The applicants Lilya Minasyan and Gayane Hovhannisyan (application no. 16046/11) are the wife and daughter of Mr Hovhannes Hovhannisyan, who was born in 1961 and died on 1 March 2008.

In the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v.

Did the expropriation of the first and second applicants’ property at 24 Arami Street satisfy the requirements of “lawfulness” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention ( Minasyan

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-43, 23 June 2009). COMPLAINTS   20.