Criminal proceedings against the applicant On 6 March 2009 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant for the attempted murder of a police officer on 5 March 2005. 16 March

The District Court noted that that finding did not breach Russia’s international obligations because, in particular, Article 12 of the Convention provided that the right to marry was to be exercised in

A... avait fini par déclarer que Loïc B... et Franck C..., qui accompagnaient avec elle Jean-Marc Z..., lui avaient dit avoir "tout expliqué" à Jean-Claude Y... et que ce dernier lui avait également dit

Nos. 24954/94, 24971/94 and 24972/94) against San   Marino, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 17 May and 9 February 1994 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Jean-Marc

The applicant in this case lived as a woman and would only wish to marry a man.

The applicant emphasised that the Constitutional Court’s finding of 6   March 2003 formally concerned the period after 11 October 2000.

  On 14 March 2001 the public prosecutor issued a decision of non prosecution relying on the medical reports dated 24 February, 3 March and 8 March 2001, according to which there was no sign of ill-treatment

On 17 March 2008 the local police instituted investigation into the circumstances of the accident. The applicant was questioned on 18 March 2008.

On 31 March 2000 the opinion prepared by a panel of three experts was submitted to the prosecutor.

In March 2010 the Saatli District Executive Authority (“SDEA”) removed the door and four windows of the building on the side facing H.

on 20 March 2010.

On 28   November   2006 the police sent the applicant a penalty notice fining him 250.38 euros (EUR) and five penalty points for a minor offence.

the Court in this case concerns an infringement of the applicant’s right of access to a court due to the refusal by the court of appeal to reopen in absentia proceedings which took place in 2006 (on 9 March

2021 communicated on 31 March 2025   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment during her arrest and police custody.

The Fund rejected his request on 29 November 2010 finding that the applicant should not have climbed the machine from which he had fallen since that had not been his work-related task.

.sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 15 April 2024   FIRST SECTION Application no. 23005/23 David ODDONE against San Marino lodged on 25 May 2023 communicated on 26 March

Vinnytsya in the period between September 2012 and March 2013.

mission in Helsinki   Judges from the European Court of Human Rights have today completed a fact-finding mission in Helsinki, in the case N. v.

    The Satu Mare Prison 39.