assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva

Korolev, a lawyer practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.

B..., représenté par Me Koroleva, demande au juge des référés, saisi sur le fondement de l’article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d’enjoindre au préfet de police de lui délivrer un

  27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no.

inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 53583/13 Vasiliy Fedorovich KOROLEV

Krsta GIGIĆ 1947 Serbian Koceljeva 2. Milka GIGIC 1949 Serbian Koceljeva    

Sabinin Stavropol 06/09/2018, 8.15 p.m. 07/09/2018, until trial hearing Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva

  41461/10, §§   108-11, 27 November 2012, concerning excessive length of pre-trial detention; Korneyeva v.

assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva

    Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant domestic law and practice have been summarised in the Court’s judgment in the case of Sivova and Koleva v. Bulgaria , no.

Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v.

assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva

  27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v.   Russia, no.   72051/17, §   34, 8   October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v.

L’appréciation de ce seuil est, par nature, relative et dépend des circonstances de l’espèce ( Korolev c.   Russie , n o   25551/05, 1 er juillet 2010, et, mutatis mutandis, Soering c.

The applicant participated in a face-to-face confrontation with Mr   Korolev, director of “Notes”. The applicant denied that he had ever seen Mr Korolev or received any money from him.

lui appartient, selon le vœu des Hautes Parties Contractantes (voir Rapport explicatif, §   80), d'établir des critères objectifs par le biais du développement progressif de sa jurisprudence ( Korolev

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 24 juillet 2025, Mme A B, représentée par Me Koroleva, demande au juge des référés, statuant sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-3 du code

B..., représentée par Me Koroleva, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’enjoindre au préfet des Hauts-de-Seine de lui délivrer un rendez-vous pour la prise de ses données biométriques dans un délai de dix jours

En 1980, à une date non communiquée, M me Maritsa Mechkarova décéda et laissa comme héritière sa fille, M me Lilyana Koleva.