CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

37 047 résultats pour « Hechinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1201DEC003574297

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 1998

1 décembre 1998

    On 31 August 1994, the Cosenza investigating judge summoned the applicant to appear before the Cosenza Magistrate at a hearing on 4 April 1995.

Page 5 sur 1853

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1216JUD001212986

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 1992

16 décembre 1992

  Mr Hennings lodged his application with the Commission on 16 April 1986.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0412JUD006043708

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2012

12 avril 2012

or to hold an oral hearing itself.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0228JUD000548805

Admin. suprême

28 février 2012

28 février 2012

Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Public hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0215DEC002822295

Admin. suprême

15 février 2000

15 février 2000

  The Reindeer Herding Act     Reindeer herding is governed by the 1971 Reindeer Hunting Act.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303DEC001354516

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2020

3 mars 2020

    On 10 July 2015 the trial court contacted the reception centre in Skopje to summon M.M. and M.D. for a subsequent hearing. 8.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-437008-437651

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2001

24 octobre 2001

  However, the hearing concerns the admissibility of the case only and the main issues relate to whether the applicants fell within the “jurisdiction” of the respondent States under Article 1 (obligation

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1906573-2002433

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2007

30 janvier 2007

10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   72 30.01.2007   Press release issued by the Registrar   HEARING

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0701DEC007008401

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2003

1 juillet 2003

Throughout the hearings before the Erzurum State Security Court the applicants stated that they had accepted the allegations against them under duress while in police custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021REP002734795

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1998

21 octobre 1998

  (e)   The court-martial hearing   39.   The accused is given an opportunity to object to any particular member of the court-martial and to its general constitution.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0209DEC003577502

Admin. suprême

9 février 2006

9 février 2006

The first hearing was held on 4 September 1995.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2337

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2007

11 décembre 2007

The applicant groups lodged an amparo appeal with the Constitutional Court complaining, inter alia, of violations of their right to an impartial hearing, the rights of the defence, their right to a hearing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1125DEC002703395

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 1996

25 novembre 1996

Reindeer herding is regulated by the Reindeer Herding Act.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117DEC000659308

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2012

17 janvier 2012

Under the same heading, the applicant contended that the same judge, having decided to place him in pre-trial detention, had also taken part in the trial as a judge member.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0617JUD007071910

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2014

17 juin 2014

The detainees who were summoned before the court waited in a separate room to attend the hearing. The room had sanitary facilities, running water, heating, electric light and a double window.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10895

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2016

22 mars 2016

health problems, he had been left without any medical supervision during the first two years of his detention, until his health had worsened to the extent that he could no longer take part in court hearings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111032

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2012

30 mars 2012

Between 26 October 2007 and 13 October 2011 the Assize Court held thirteen hearings and scheduled the next one for 13 February 2012.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0308JUD001489505

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2016

8 mars 2016

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Public hearing);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0516DEC003244702

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2006

16 mai 2006

The Court’s assessment Oral hearing The entitlement to a “public hearing” in Article 6 § 1 necessarily implies a right to an “oral hearing”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206497

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2020

9 novembre 2020

On 1 September 2006 the applicant company concluded a contract for supply of natural gas (“the contract”) with a natural gas provider (“the provider”) for the supply of natural gas for the heating of its

Source officielle