In 1947, after the birth the second applicant, the competent authority allocated an additional room to the family.

Palermo Palermo Court of Appeal R.G. 163/2020, 03/04/2020 17/02/2022 10/03/2022 200 30     33556/21 21/06/2021 Arcangelo TAURIELLO 1974   Faggella Giuseppe San Fele Potenza Court of Appeal

Moreover, there was no obstacle for the applicants settling as a family elsewhere. 15.

sitting on 5   June 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Application no. 1153/10 by Alexandru and Tamara Băluţă 12.     The first applicant, Mr Alexandru Băluţă, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1984 and lives in Lunga.

    The Family Burden Equalisation Act 18.

    Article 110 of the Family and Custody Code of 1964 ( Kodeks Rodzinny i   Opiekuńczy - “The Family Code”) states that if parental rights cannot be exercised they may be suspended by a

  He relies on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Kondu v.

Bulgaria (application no. 24379/02) The applicant, Alexandar Angelov Kounov, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1973 and lives in Roussé (Bulgaria).

    Complaint under Article 8 of the Convention concerning restrictions on family visits 17.

Since 1945 it has been exhibited in the National Museum in Wrocław. 9)     Portrait of a Family made by a Lombard painter in the 15th century.

Section 5 Surname “The civil union shall not change the (family) name of the parties.

the Chişinău Local Council together with the Government to provide the applicant with accommodation Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.1   13272/07, 09.01.2007 STRELŢOV Alexandru

    On 2 July 2007 the applicant applied before the County Office for recognition as the family member of a fallen war veteran and family disability benefit. 21.

  The applicant alleged, in particular, that his applications to have his visiting rights enforced had not been examined fairly and within a reasonable time and that his right to respect for his family

family ( Slivenko v.

He also complains that his right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 has been infringed both by the length of the proceedings and by the failure to enforce his right of access.

    Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to respect for private and family life, within the meaning of Article   8 §   1 of the Convention as a result of their

para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Length delay in fixing and payment of final compensation for expropriation: violation (Extract from press release) Facts : The applicants, Alexandre