Identical letters were then sent by registered post to the applicant's and his parents' addresses on 6 and 7 January 2010.

On 11 September 2015 the same letter was sent to other known addresses of the applicant. All letters were returned undelivered.

The same latter was sent to the Branice Regional Psychiatric Hospital and to the applicant’s home address.

The case was communicated to the respondent Government, whose observations were sent to the applicant for comment by 12 May 2009.

By letter dated 8 February 2023, sent through eComms and by post, the applicant company’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the observations had expired and that no

Since the postal deliveries to Russia had been interrupted since March   2022, a copy of the letter with a request to appoint a new attorney was sent to the applicant by email.

By letter dated 8 February 2023, sent both through eComms and by post, the applicants’ representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the observations on the applicant’s behalf had

551 ; d’enjoindre au maire de Juziers de délivrer un certificat d’urbanisme opérationnel positif dans le délai d’un mois à compter de la notification du jugement à intervenir en indiquant que la sente

Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 17. marca 2016.#Canadian Oil Company Sweden AB in Anders Rantén proti Riksåklagaren.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Högsta domstolen.

Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 16. februarja 2017.#C. K. in drugi proti Republika Slovenija.

Sodba Sodišča (prvi senat) z dne 9. februarja 2006.#La Cascina Soc. coop. arl in Zilch Srl proti Ministero della Difesa in drugi (C-226/04) in Consorzio G. f.

Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje (prvi senat) z dne 24. maja 2007.#Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti.

Sodba Splošnega sodišča (šesti senat) z dne 3. marca 2016.#Ugly, Inc. proti Uradu za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli).

The Supreme Court sent the complaint to the Tula Regional Court. 19 .

Cette demande fut soumise à l'examen de la Commission de la Justice du Sénat.

    On 4 July 2011 the Senate of the Supreme Court ( Augstākās tiesas Senāts ) refused leave to appeal on points of law.

The Senate recognised that there was nothing in the case file to suggest that A.S. had owned the contested property. 18 .

Sodba Sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 28. januarja 2015.#Harald Kolassa proti Barclays Bank plc.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Handelsgericht Wien.