CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

88 661 résultats pour « Mady »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0729JUD001183003

Admin. suprême

29 juillet 2008

29 juillet 2008

On 25 May 2001 he was charged with the rape of a minor (“the rape case”). 11.     As disclosed by the case file, on 26 May 2001 the applicant was assigned a lawyer, Mr S.

Page 49 sur 4434

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0403JUD002722995

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2001

3 avril 2001

    Save for a short note on 4 May 1993 that at “11.00 hours clopixol 500   mg given”, no further entry was made in Mark Keenan’s medical notes from the 3 May 1993 until his suicide on 15

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113703

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2012

17 septembre 2012

    Press statements made by public officials 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC005937208

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2018

22 mai 2018

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0504DEC002020402

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2004

4 mai 2004

On 29 May 2002 the Court of Appeal ordered that the applicant's detention be prolonged until 1 October 2002.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127381

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2013

23 septembre 2013

Challenges to admissibility on such grounds may be made either in advance of the trial or in its course.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014DEC002799002

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2008

14 octobre 2008

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The applicant's wife died on 27 June 1995.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC001168003

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

The court referred to the results of the enquiries made of the hospital by various authorities, and to the list of patients admitted to the hospital in May and June 1995 which did not include Armen Aloyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1201JUD004822610

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2015

1 décembre 2015

    The Government also stated that, prior to the order of 5 May 2008, the domestic courts had already made thirty-four orders blocking access to YouTube on account of illegal content hosted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0416JUD003329209

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2013

16 avril 2013

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of A.B. v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0524JUD001073784

Admin. suprême

24 mai 1988

24 mai 1988

Having achieved a certain repute, he may find it unnecessary to shock by resorting to vulgarity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0513DEC001828891

Admin. suprême

13 mai 1992

13 mai 1992

        The Commission's assessment of the risk of ill-treatment to which an applicant may be exposed must be made in the light of all the material placed before it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5265

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2002

11 juillet 2002

In that regard, it was artificial to assert that post-operative transsexuals had not been deprived of the right to marry because they remained able to marry a person of their former opposite sex.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC003748407

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709JUD007102113

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2020

9 juillet 2020

Lastly, the child’s best interests must be the primary consideration and may, depending on their nature and seriousness, override those of the parents (see, among many other authorities, Olsson v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0117JUD002566402

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2006

17 janvier 2006

The Court in many instances has found Ukraine directly responsible for debts of State-owned enterprises in similar circumstances (see, among many others, Chernobryvko v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142594

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2014

24 mars 2014

They requested that their statements - both those made to the police and those made to the magistrate - be excluded from the prosecution’s evidence. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175523

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2017

20 juin 2017

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141413

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2014

27 janvier 2014

be made of his residence, premises or storage place in order to undertake an arrest or to look for evidence or objects that may be seized or on which a charge [ heftelse ] may be created.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC003979707

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2018

22 mai 2018

    Later on the same day the applicant made a confession statement.

Source officielle