The Bucharest County Court had confined itself to noting that church activity had been suspended, and those observations had been rather general in character to the extent that the court had not looked

N.H. and A.J. had lodged urgent applications asking the administrative court to order the prefect to speed up the processing of their files but had been unsuccessful.

had been designated to assist him.

There had been no suggestion, and there was no indication, that the proceedings had had no prospects of success or could not afford redress.

had been present during the interviews when the applicant had made those statements.

The first and second applicants had argued that they had assumed the role of the third applicant’s parents, and that he had regarded them as such; the quality of their bond had not been contested by the

s mother had come to see her and had told her that R. had returned from school upset and bleeding. CT. had told her to come back the following day with R.

G.M. had gestured to the applicant to stop; however, the latter had run away. He had been chased and stopped.

In its subsequent remedies, the applicant company had not argued that the lower court(s) had misconstrued its civil action.

Such a decision, which had clarified the issues while remaining within the limits laid down by the Court of Cassation on 22 April 1992, had been favourable to the applicants, since it had had the effect

  Mr Mechenkov alleged that he was infected with hepatitis C following his arrest in October 2001 as he had had medical check-ups in August 2000 and October 2001 which had not revealed any sign of

He had then left the military position and had been informed about 30-40 minutes later that six dead bodies had been found there.

The interference had been prescribed by law. It had pursued a legitimate aim, namely the protection of the reputation of another, namely R.D.

, when she had called the emergency helpline. - During the second occasion, when the police had intervened at the bus station, the relevant police report had made clear that the applicant had told them

When asked at the security check whether he had any cash, he had replied in the affirmative.

Toutefois, Mme M'Hadji ne produit pas l'arrêté préfectoral du 24 septembre 2022. 4.

Their names had not been found in any detention facility records and the Government had not submitted any explanation as to what had happened to them after their arrest.

she had been entitled under the law.

The court acknowledged that the VCA had acted unlawfully when allocating land to the applicants; however, it considered that the applicants had not proven that they had suffered any pecuniary damage.