The applicants alleged, in particular, that the election in their electoral constituency had not been free and fair owing to numerous instances of electoral fraud and that their right to

Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election

Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections - {general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just

  1: The applicants had put forward a very serious and arguable claim disclosing an apparent failure to hold free and fair elections in their constituency.

Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction

Such intimidation and pressure negatively restricted political campaigning in a fair and free atmosphere, in contradiction to Article 7.5 and 7.7 of the Copenhagen Document. VIII.

(b)     Free legal assistance 31.     The Court has previously summarised its findings concerning the right to free legal assistance as follows (see Orlov v.

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No.

#Free movement of live trees and other plants, bulbs, roots and the like, cut flowers and ornamental foliage.#Case 94/79.

(e)     to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.” A.     Admissibility 32.

  1, which reads as follows: “The High Contracting Parties undertake to hold free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the

. # Free movement of goods - Quasi-pharmaceutical products - Prohibition on advertising outside the pharmacy. # Case C-292/92.

[Localité 1] de nationalité française [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représentée par Maître Sophie CREPIN de la SELARL LEXAVOUE, avocat au barreau de PAU assistée de Maître Charles FREIDEL

Adresse 1] [Localité 1] Représentée par Me Bruno REGNIER de la SCP SCP REGNIER - BEQUET - MOISAN, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : L0050 Assistée par Me Alexandra NERI du Cabinet HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS

[Adresse 3] ESPAGNE Représentée par Me Bruno REGNIER de la SCP REGNIER - BEQUET - MOISAN, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque L 0050 Assistée de Me Sébastien PROUST plaidant pour HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS

Julien Fradel, maître des requêtes en service extraordinaire, - les conclusions de M.

Représentée par : Me François TEYTAUD (avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : J125) Assistée de : Me Aurélie TRASSY-PAILLOGUES substituant Me Pierre POPESCO et Me Jonathan MATTOUT du Cabinet HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS

forêt Rhône-Alpes intitulé « Montant des indemnités relatif au virus de la sharka – année 2003 » ainsi que du tableau intitulé «Bilan de la prospection sharka réalisée de 1997 à 2007» établi par le FREDEC

à la société Kalithys un permis de construire afin de réaliser une résidence séniors et jeunes de 99 logements en R+2 et attique avec un parking souterrain sur une parcelle située cours Béranger de Frédol