Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2876661-3155414
30 septembre 2009
30 septembre 2009
him from communicating with the media had been limited in scope and that the sanction imposed (the reprimand of 18 March 2003), which was of moderate severity, had been set aside, the Court considered
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109DEC002905404
9 novembre 2010
9 novembre 2010
He further complained under Article 5 of the Convention that his pre trial detention had been lengthy and unlawful.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2980314-3286101
6 janvier 2010
6 janvier 2010
promised anonymity, had provided information about an illegal street car race organised in January 2002, at which photographs had been taken by the applicant company.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC000907609
14 février 2012
14 février 2012
According to the information obtained from the official website of the Turkish Postal Service, on 26 August 2011 this letter has been delivered. However, no response has been received.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0613DEC007451101
13 juin 2002
13 juin 2002
Subsequently, the applicant has been extradited to the United States.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC004317298
21 mars 2002
21 mars 2002
on 1 October 2000 the second applicant had been paid by the bailiffs 2,069,545.36 RUR, equivalent at the material time to 74,632 USD.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2200566-2343331
28 novembre 2007
28 novembre 2007
In its Chamber judgment of 18 April 2006 (press release No. 222, 2006), the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been no violation of Articles 8 or 12.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0311DEC000183604
11 mars 2008
11 mars 2008
In a letter of 22 February 2007 the Ministry of Justice informed the applicant that his application had been accepted, that it had been found that his right to a determination of his civil claim within
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2949510-3251688
2 décembre 2009
2 décembre 2009
Decision of the Court The Court applied an extensive interpretation of “home”, which had been extended to professional premises.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0525DEC004225298
25 mai 1999
25 mai 1999
It has not been shown that detention was incompatible with his condition.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1115DEC005003499
15 novembre 2001
15 novembre 2001
By letter dated 13 May 1993, she was informed that her appeal had been rejected.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023DEC001095707
23 octobre 2012
23 octobre 2012
Relying on Article 3 of the Convention the applicants maintained that they had been ill-treated during their arrest and that their allegations of ill ‑ treatment had not been thoroughly
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0117DEC005344099
17 janvier 2002
17 janvier 2002
The first requirement has clearly been met. The second remains to be considered.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130DEC005003499
30 novembre 2000
30 novembre 2000
No clearer statement could have been made by Mrs Obasa that there was discrimination due to her ethnic origin.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC002042705
22 octobre 2013
22 octobre 2013
In particular he complained that his right to legal assistance had been breached because he had been denied access to his lawyer at the police station after the arrest and because the lawyer had been asked
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD003543005
4 avril 2013
4 avril 2013
And last, the evaluation of the flats had been within the domestic authorities’ margin of appreciation, the domestic courts had found that Krasnoprudnaya had been a fair replacement, and the Court should
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9526
12 juin 2014
12 juin 2014
The Denationalisation Act 1991 permitted previous owners (or their heirs) to claim restitution of properties that had been expropriated by the State, including dwellings which had been let under the “specially
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2809100-3077411
23 juillet 2009
23 juillet 2009
That decisive factor should have been taken into account by the French courts in their assessment of the publishing company’s liability, but this had not been the case.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2657205-2899486
5 mars 2009
5 mars 2009
The Court noted that, even though there had been no formal declaration of the demonstration beforehand, the authorities had been aware of it and had not stopped it going ahead; they had also had
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0907DEC005094199
7 septembre 2000
7 septembre 2000
Berger, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application introduced on 21 March 1999 and registered on 16 September 1999, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE
Source officiellePage 49 sur 4750