CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000950402
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because she had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Page 49 sur 1499
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000951402
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000972002
In this connection they submitted that the applicants did enjoy access to a court because they had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Varaždin Municipal Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510DEC001733805
10 mai 2007
The Court considers that it does not have to answer the question of exhaustion of domestic remedies because the application is anyhow inadmissible for the following reasons.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0315DEC005053099
15 mars 2001
Between September 1993 and June 1994 the applicants were dismissed from their posts because the American base where they used to work closed down.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0304DEC001152385
4 mars 1987
This letter was stopped because it contained unventilated complaints.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC003888502
23 septembre 2003
of his work in DSP and for Mobutu, because of his Ngbandi ethnicity and because of his close connections with the family of Mobutu.
civ2
607940d89ba5988459c3f561
27 mai 1970
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DE L'ARRET INFIRMATIF ATTAQUE ET DES PRODUCTIONS QU'A LA SUITE D'UNE COLLISION SURVENUE ENTRE SA VOITURE AUTOMOBILE ET CELLE DE BERCHARD, LACRAMPE A DEMANDE
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913JUD003520703
13 septembre 2005
Because of insufficient funding, the provision of meat, fish and dairy products was not always possible.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1215DEC001080284
15 décembre 1988
invoked by the applicant because he had prior to the trial expressly renounced challenging these judges.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD003621613
14 mars 2017
He expresses fear of the father because he does not know how the father would behave. He stated that he likes it in I. because before he was afraid and had to listen to the parents fighting.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD003670109
27 novembre 2014
On 29 December 2004 the Government of Croatia adopted an instruction whereby it (a) instructed the State Attorney’s Office to acknowledge the plaintiffs’ claim in those proceedings because
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC006211010
10 juillet 2012
The second assessment, made by the Goodman Team, was also unreliable because it relied heavily upon the earlier flawed Abbeyfield assessment and because the Team were geared from the outset towards the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406DEC006841601
6 avril 2004
The charge that McDonald's food is very unhealthy because it is high in fat, sugar, animal products and salt (sodium), and low in fibre, vitamins and minerals, and because eating it more than just occasionally
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004323198
13 novembre 2003
A second hearing was scheduled for 30 June 1998 because Ms M.V. and two other witnesses failed to show up.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0530JUD004506617
30 mai 2023
The Finnish court obviously did not prove that, nor did it try to prove it at all, because it does not concern them – and it does not concern them because they did not even put Mesić on trial, and therefore
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD002312616
1 mars 2022
the offence in question to exist, and because such an analysis would have given the impression that the act, that was classified as an offence by the law, was less dangerous.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024JUD003294917
24 octobre 2019
It may be that it is because applications are being refused. Or it may be because claimants are bridging the gap in other ways.” 20 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC005072099
23 octobre 2001
He also complained that he had been denied effective access to an amparo appeal to the Constitutional Court because of the shortcomings of the legal assistance provided to him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC003671210
22 octobre 2019
As to the third defendant, who was the mayor of the village, she stated that she had included him in the action because his signature was on the letter. 11.