CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 493 résultats pour « Alexandre BECAUD »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111560

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2009

15 septembre 2009

In the second, the applicants are Mr Alexander Hutton Johnston Mitchell, Mr William James Sampson and Mr Leslie Walker.

Page 49 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-983907-1018104

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2004

22 avril 2004

  Relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), the applicant submitted that three judges who had sat on the Perugia Court bench had not been impartial because they had previously examined the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD005172899

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2012

5 juin 2012

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003; Alexandrou v.   Turkey (merits), no.   16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009; Anthousa Iordanou v.   Turkey (just satisfaction), no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD002754005

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD000554805

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2014

13 novembre 2014

xa0; Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD003568811

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2016

24 novembre 2016

The applicant stated that there was no longer any need to cover up for V.M. because he was dead.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1002JUD004719106

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2014

2 octobre 2014

The Court need not determine whether or not Scientology is a religion because it can defer to the judgment of the Russian authorities on that matter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC003630910

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

    By a decision which became final on 26 September 2000 the Skopje Court of First Instance upheld a claim ( утврдува пријавено побарување ) against S. in favour of a certain Mr D.T.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD002643605

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0306JUD004919208

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2014

6 mars 2014

    The applicant alleged that his right to liberty under Article 5 of the Convention had been breached because he had been detained from 19   July   to 29 July 2008 without a court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0411JUD002667606

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2013

11 avril 2013

He also stated that he could not influence the witnesses because he was not acquainted with them. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD000146916

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

Even if the applicant’s release from prison became effective a few days after the entering into force of this Law, the Government failed to show that he was afforded a redress in concreto .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0525JUD003252616

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2022

25 mai 2022

    The Government raised a preliminary objection concerning loss of victim status by the applicants for the periods of detention specified in the appended table because they were afforded adequate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD005942816

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2024

11 avril 2024

  59428/16, 9733/17, 34031/18 and 21525/20, the Government raised a preliminary objection concerning loss of the victim status by the applicants for certain periods of detention because they were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD003195616

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 2022

27 octobre 2022

51383/16, 67896/16, 21069/19 and 63585/19, the Government raised a preliminary objection concerning loss of victim status by the applicants for the periods of detention specified in the appended table because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0408JUD001105702

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2004

8 avril 2004

The applicants were incapable of bringing up their children because of their own basic and irreparable educational deficiencies and their abuse of parental authority.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2018

31 mai 2018

Following the end of her term of office and elections of Section Presidents, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President of the First Section, became the President of the Chamber (Rules 8 § 1, 12 and 26 § 3)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD001430517

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2020

22 décembre 2020

Ksenija Turković succeeded Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos as President of the Grand Chamber (Rules 10 and 11).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1011JUD005521608

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2018

11 octobre 2018

of its shameful or ridiculous nature or because it reveals their biological descent, must submit a request, giving reasons, to the competent prefect. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0607JUD001631413

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2018

7 juin 2018

The Regional Court denied the request because the facts had been proved to a sufficient degree.

Source officielle