CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111560
15 septembre 2009
In the second, the applicants are Mr Alexander Hutton Johnston Mitchell, Mr William James Sampson and Mr Leslie Walker.
Page 49 sur 75
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-983907-1018104
22 avril 2004
Relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), the applicant submitted that three judges who had sat on the Perugia Court bench had not been impartial because they had previously examined the
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD005172899
5 juin 2012
16219/90, § 20, 31 July 2003; Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20 January 2009; Anthousa Iordanou v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD002754005
25 septembre 2012
Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nina Vajić, President, Peer Lorenzen, Elisabeth Steiner, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD000554805
13 novembre 2014
xa0; Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President, Elisabeth Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD003568811
24 novembre 2016
The applicant stated that there was no longer any need to cover up for V.M. because he was dead.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1002JUD004719106
2 octobre 2014
The Court need not determine whether or not Scientology is a religion because it can defer to the judgment of the Russian authorities on that matter.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC003630910
24 mai 2016
By a decision which became final on 26 September 2000 the Skopje Court of First Instance upheld a claim ( утврдува пријавено побарување ) against S. in favour of a certain Mr D.T.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD002643605
9 octobre 2012
Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nina Vajić, President, Anatoly Kovler, Peer Lorenzen, Elisabeth Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0306JUD004919208
6 mars 2014
The applicant alleged that his right to liberty under Article 5 of the Convention had been breached because he had been detained from 19 July to 29 July 2008 without a court
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0411JUD002667606
11 avril 2013
He also stated that he could not influence the witnesses because he was not acquainted with them. 14.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD000146916
20 mai 2021
Even if the applicant’s release from prison became effective a few days after the entering into force of this Law, the Government failed to show that he was afforded a redress in concreto .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0525JUD003252616
25 mai 2022
The Government raised a preliminary objection concerning loss of victim status by the applicants for the periods of detention specified in the appended table because they were afforded adequate
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD005942816
11 avril 2024
59428/16, 9733/17, 34031/18 and 21525/20, the Government raised a preliminary objection concerning loss of the victim status by the applicants for certain periods of detention because they were
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD003195616
27 octobre 2022
51383/16, 67896/16, 21069/19 and 63585/19, the Government raised a preliminary objection concerning loss of victim status by the applicants for the periods of detention specified in the appended table because
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0408JUD001105702
8 avril 2004
The applicants were incapable of bringing up their children because of their own basic and irreparable educational deficiencies and their abuse of parental authority.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411
31 mai 2018
Following the end of her term of office and elections of Section Presidents, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President of the First Section, became the President of the Chamber (Rules 8 § 1, 12 and 26 § 3)
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD001430517
22 décembre 2020
Ksenija Turković succeeded Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos as President of the Grand Chamber (Rules 10 and 11).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1011JUD005521608
11 octobre 2018
of its shameful or ridiculous nature or because it reveals their biological descent, must submit a request, giving reasons, to the competent prefect. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0607JUD001631413
7 juin 2018
The Regional Court denied the request because the facts had been proved to a sufficient degree.