A imposait aux collégiennes de lui faire la bise en montant dans le car, dès lors que ces faits étaient prescrits en application de l'article L. 122-44 du code du travail, d'autre part, sur ce que le

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1980 and lives in Vilnius. 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1984 and lives in Boscana. 6.

France , no. 53406/10, 10   January 2013] Facts – In Agnelet , the applicant was sentenced in 2007 by the Assize Court to twenty years’ imprisonment for murder.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

In this connection the Court needs to determine whether such facts had been established in the case at hand.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1979 and is currently in detention in Zhytomyr, Ukraine. A.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1982 in Achinsk, Krasnoyarsk Region. He lives in Krasnoyarsk. A.     Conviction 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicants were all parties to unrelated sets of civil proceedings. 5.

They had only considered the facts established by that decision, not the decision itself, and the applicant’s view of the facts had been generally known, and known to the court, through the exercise of