CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411
31 mai 2018
Poland and supplemented by the 2014 US Senate Committee Report C.
Page 48 sur 1225
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126668
5 septembre 2013
On 14 October 2010 the Izmir 10 th Assize Court decided that statutorily the Izmir 1 st Assize Court had jurisdiction for the trial and sent the file to the Court of Cassation for determination of the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0617DEC003491706
17 juin 2014
By letter dated 25 January 2013 the Government’s observations were sent at two addresses indicated by the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0319DEC004845312
19 mars 2020
This letter was sent to the address the applicant had indicated in her last correspondence. No reply was received to this letter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1011DEC002730116
11 octobre 2018
This letter, sent to the home address provided by him, returned to the Court with the mention that the applicant had changed address.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308DEC000540807
8 mars 2018
The letter was sent by registered post. No response followed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0313DEC000978114
13 mars 2018
The Registry’s letter of 2 March 2017, sent to the prison facility, was returned to the Court with an annotation that the applicant had been released on 5 November 2015 and the information
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC002685710
12 décembre 2017
The communication letter of 27 July 2015, sent to the address provided by the applicant, has been returned undelivered with an annotation on the envelope “the addressee moved out”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022DEC002812410
22 octobre 2015
By letter dated 23 April 2015, sent by registered post to the applicant’s home address, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 31 March 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC003337608
24 mars 2015
By letter dated 6 February 2014 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 10
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC006653613
13 septembre 2018
On 31 May 2018 the letter sent to the applicant was returned to the Court as refused. THE LAW 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC001440114
18 janvier 2024
The Government’s observations, received in April 2023, were sent to the applicant’s representative for comments via the Court’s electronic communications service (eComms).
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7419
5 février 2013
The final domestic ruling was sent to him on 24 August 2010.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0313DEC002058013
The Registry’s letter of 2 March 2017, sent to the prison facility, was returned to the Court with an annotation that the applicant had been released and the information of his home address
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC001885405
27 septembre 2011
On 3 June 2011 the local postal office sent a notification to the applicant asking him to collect the letter from the post office.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC002379207
12 janvier 2010
After notice of the application was given to the Government, by a letter dated 12 May 2009, their observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit, by 23 June 2009, observations in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0121DEC002140511
21 janvier 2014
The applicant, who was released from prison in August 2012, did not reply to a letter sent by the Court on 14 March 2013.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206DEC002174720
6 février 2025
The letter sent by post was returned to the Registry as unclaimed on 25 November 2024.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914DEC001813820
14 septembre 2023
On 17 May 2023 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant with the Government’s position on the question of a friendly settlement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC004982407
27 janvier 2015
THE LAW By letter dated 6 February 2014 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by