Had the legislator wanted to limit subsection (f) he would have done so explicitly but no such qualification had been made.

receiving food parcels from their relatives, that the prisoners had been provided with medical assistance and had been regularly examined by prison doctors, that the WC area in both prisons had been separated

85270 NOTRE DAME DE RIEZ représenté par Monsieur Michel Y..., délégué syndical ouvrier, muni d'un pouvoir INTIMEE : La Société VIANIMO ZI Séguinière 72300 SABLE SUR SARTHE représentée par la SCP HAY

[Adresse 12] [Adresse 3] [Localité 7] représentée par Maître David HALLER de la SELARL EVENSTEN AVOCATS, avocats au barreau de PARIS - #A0114 DEFENDEURS La société S.A.S.

Pascal, vice-président, pour statuer sur les demandes de référé. Les parties ont été régulièrement averties du jour de l'audience.

She had told a social worker that B., the first applicant’s then boyfriend, had “hurt my bum”.

They maintained that the applicant had had unrestricted contact with his lawyers and they had eventually been allowed access to the case file. 85.

The applicants were asked questions about a parcel that the second applicant had received from his parents on 24 December 2003, which included food, letters and other items, whether they had eaten the

Finally, while it had not been established with sufficient clarity whether permission for a priest to visit had been requested, there had been no regular visits.

He found that the records had a tick on the top right hand corner and were numbered on the back. Those markings had not been on the documents when he had seen them before.

qu'ils avaient formées au titre d'un droit de passage sur la parcelle n° 336 appartenant aux consorts Y...

Obviously, therefore, some property has value although it does not have an underlying profit potential.

B n° 465 disposait d'une servitude de passage sur la parcelle cadastrée section B n° 475 et, par voie de conséquence, sur les parcelles n° 473 et 475 ; AUX MOTIFS QU'aux termes de l'article 688 du code

DB3Z-W-B7I-GTSW NAC : 70B JUGEMENT DU JUGE DE L’EXÉCUTION le 02 mai 2024 DEMANDEURS Madame [Y] [X] [A] veuve [R] [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] [Localité 6] Rep/assistant : Maître Eric HAN

land had potential for development (see Maria Azzopardi v.

The prosecutor did not accept that the applicant had not been permitted to use toilets.

    The applicant had a plot of land in the Yolağzı Village of Batman, which had been registered in the land register as parcel no. 410. 5.

the court as to how he had come by those injuries. 13.

AM [Cadastre 1]., demeurant [Adresse 8] - [Localité 13] représenté par Me Geneviève NEUER-JOCQUEL, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 369 Madame [N] [C] Es qualité de propriétaire de la parcelle