du 18 janvier 2024 Rejet Mme TEILLER, président Arrêt n° 37 F-D Pourvoi n° R 22-23.677 R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A I S E _________________________ AU NOM

2024 Cassation partielle Mme CHAMPALAUNE, président Arrêt n° 651 F-D Pourvoi n° H 23-18.337 R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A I S E _________________________ AU NOM

  The court did not think it necessary to suspend the proceedings, so that the opinion of parliament could be sought, since the statements complained of had not been made in connection with the exercise

Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 64, ECHR 1999-I).

Violation of Art. 6-1;Not necessary to examine Art. 13;Not necessary to examine Art. 14;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings

As the domestic courts had noted, index-linking for all pensioners, wherever they had chosen to live, would inevitably have had random effects while, unlike residents, non-residents did not contribute

    The applicants submit that the first applicant was not informed of the hearing that had been scheduled, nor did she receive a summons to it.

Nor had the Italian courts considered any alternative solutions for ensuring contact between the boy and his father. The interference had thus not been necessary in a democratic society.

The fact that the applicant’s lawyer had not been given full access to the case file did not alter the position as a violation of Article 5 § 4 on that account (see below) did not automatically entail

They conceded that in their non-exhaustion plea before the Chamber they had not claimed that the applicant should have availed himself of that remedy, but argued that they were not estopped from raising

It is not a denial of respect for her as an individual. She was under no obligation to move to South Africa. She did so voluntarily and no doubt for good reasons.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le quatorze novembre deux mille un, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Casino France SNC, dont le siège social

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Gideppe groupe international de diffusion

Y figuraient en particulier maints passages sapant non seulement l'autorité, mais aussi la confiance entre élèves et maîtres. 32.

    En juillet 1989, les requérants furent condamnés pour non-respect de la mise en demeure. 18.

    Le requérant affirme qu’un permis a été accordé à un non-Tsigane pour garer une caravane sur le site jouxtant le sien.

No violation of Art. 2 (substantive);Violation of Art. 2 (procedural);No violation of Art. 3;Violation of Art. 5;No violation of Art. 8;Violation of Art. 13;Not necessary to examine Art. 18;Non-pecuniary