appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 5   May 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria

RG 24/03334 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7I-CJYPQ Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 22 juillet 2024, à 12h52, par le juge des libertés et de la détention du tribunal judiciaire de Paris Nous, Maria-Pia

Duncan Felton, demeurant 10, rue Borne Bertel, 77600 Bussy-Saint-Georges, 26 / de Mme Maria, Lucilia Ferreira, demeurant 18, 11ème avenue, 93290 Tremblay-en-France, 27 / de M.

In the case of Maria Ivanova v.

Article 7(3) of the State Treaty only constituted an obligation binding on the Republic of Austria under international law to erect bilingual road signs in areas where linguistic minorities live, but did

On 7 May 1985, the first applicant married Mr Castelo Antonio in a traditional ceremony in Angola.

  Furthermore, the Austrian courts did not apply the right criteria when judging the case.

Couple S. did not accept the terms of the new lease and did not pay outstanding arrears.

Maruste ,   Mr   S. Pavlovschi ,   Mr   L. Garlicki,   Mr   J. Borrego Borrego, judges , and Mr M.

10/1956 Częstochowa Maria WENTLANDT-WALKIEWICZ 3 15417/15 20/03/2015 Marek POLACZKIEWICZ 08/03/1961 Poczesna Maria WENTLANDT-WALKIEWICZ 4 65199/16 03/11/2016 Barbara PAPIEŻ 16/12/1950 Suwałki   Iwona

  Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures   1) Just satisfaction   As the applicant did not submit a claim for just satisfaction, the Court considered that there is no call

applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 27 June 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Carlo Ranzoni , President ,   Mārtiņš Mits,   María

The registered letters either returned to the Court as unclaimed or were received by the applicants and to which they did not respond.

They acknowledged that the applicants had been detained or transported in the conditions which did not comply with the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention.

They acknowledged in particular that the applicants had been detained in the conditions which did not comply with the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention.

The applicant did not inform the Court of the outcome of the proceedings. 2.     Application no.

le 8 juillet 2006 à Prek Preah Sdech (Cambodge), sans avoir fait précéder leur union d’un contrat de mariage.

Maruste ,   Mr   J. Borrego Borrego ,   Mrs   R. Jaeger, judges , and Mrs C.

    By failing to examine the above-mentioned arguments, the national courts did not afford the applicants adequate procedural safeguards.