CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214JUD001700903
14 février 2012
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees
Page 48 sur 763
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD002459708
13 novembre 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD006796713
30 octobre 2018
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0428JUD005920212
28 avril 2022
The Court concluded in Nasirov and Others (ibid., §§ 51-52) that the applicant’s deprivation of liberty was unjustified, arbitrary and unnecessary irrespective of its duration, and it finds
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0109JUD004706711
9 janvier 2020
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD004122320
27 octobre 2022
He relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 4 “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD005401413
20 septembre 2022
On 21 September 2012 the Leninskiy District Court of Luhansk remanded the applicant in custody, referring to the gravity of the offences with which he had been charged and noting that, if at liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD000098813
By way of reasoning, the court stated that the applicant was charged with a serious offence and, if at liberty, might abscond, interfere with the investigation or continue his criminal activity.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1212JUD003911023
12 décembre 2024
or detained persons are entitled to a review bearing upon the procedural and substantive conditions which are essential for the “lawfulness”, in the sense of the Convention, of their deprivation of liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024JUD002296411
24 octobre 2019
In view of those facts the District Court considered that, if at liberty, the applicant might interfere with the investigation or abscond. 44.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0131JUD001523018
31 janvier 2023
The present case concerns the applicant’s deprivation of liberty pending trial on several charges for a total of twenty-two months in the absence of relevant and sufficient reasons, ordered
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1009JUD007400916
9 octobre 2025
Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivations of liberty (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, § 84, ECHR 2016 (extracts), with further references). 8
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1005JUD007084010
5 octobre 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD003828304
29 janvier 2013
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Judge or other officer exercising judicial power);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Take proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD003109810
7 février 2012
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1018JUD004624508
18 octobre 2018
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law ...” A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0920JUD000434506
20 septembre 2016
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522JUD002363910
22 mai 2012
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD002292105
3 avril 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD004639809
24 avril 2014
Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his