The applicant complained that the fact that the courts had based their decisions on the opinions of the disability commissions violated his right to a fair hearing.

    On the same day, after hearing the parties, the Eyüp Civil Court dismissed the case by incorporating the high court’s reasoning in its decision. 22.

be examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention alone which, as far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing

    The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of their requests to appear in court.

France - 10917/15 and 10941/15 Judgment 25.11.2021 [Section V] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Statements given by applicants to French authorities on US base at Guantánamo not

    On 1   February 2011 the Supreme Court held a new appeal hearing.

    The applicant requested that an oral hearing be held but the Chamber decided not to hold a hearing in the case, having regard to the materials before it. THE FACTS I.

in the context of a public hearing.

I.D. pleaded the applicants’ case at hearings before both courts. N.B. was also present at the hearing before the Court of Appeal. 6.

They alleged, inter alia , that there had been a violation of their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the grounds that the quashing of the final and binding judgment in their

The HSC stated that the applicant’s presence at the hearing was not mandatory. 6 .

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

Belgium - 34238/09 Judgment 26.5.2015 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Alleged lack of adequate procedural safeguards to enable accused to understand reasons for jury

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Constitutional proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms)

    In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established

Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing;Exclusion of public)

Judgment 5.4.2016 [Section III] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Application of supervisory review procedure in applicants’ civil cases following 2008 reform in conformity with legal