Damage 60.     The applicant claimed 25,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage for each violation found by the Court in her case. 61.

That statute, which entered into force on 1   January 2017, enables those concerned to seek compensation for damage sustained as a result of excessive delays in the enforcement of court judgments

    Damage 32.     The applicant asked the Court to order the respondent State to pay him 150,000,000 Italian lire (ITL) solely for the non-pecuniary damage he had sustained. 33.

It observed that the applicant was under constant psychiatric care and his father was being looked after by the applicant’s mother. 34.

Apart from the fact that the property now looked directly onto the new motorway, once it was opened to traffic the applicant would be inconvenienced by the noise pollution and constant vibration.

Being under constant threats from the latter, C ceded to cohabiting with him. The couple never registered their marriage. 5.

Interrogated on his arrival, he remained under constant police supervision at that hospital until his death on 3   May 1996.

If there are no dependants, there is no pecuniary loss to recover as damages.

    Damage 43.

  Damage 1.   Pecuniary damage   74.

The applicant lived in constant fear of contamination.

Some of the applicants claimed that they were entitled to a further compensation of pecuniary damage (see paragraphs 32-35 below).

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and

If there is no dependency, there is no pecuniary loss to recover as damages.

A woman police constable told them that they could not go down that road as it was military land. The applicant replied that that road was a public highway.

respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them the amounts detailed in the appended table to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Consequently, there was no reasonable prospect of obtaining any damages. The applicant states that he received a copy of this opinion on 6 December 1990.

    The Court reiterates its constant approach that where an applicant has died after the application was lodged, it has accepted that the next of kin or heir may in principle pursue the application

On 7 December 1992 since the applicant was violent and threatening, restraints were used to prevent him causing damage to his cell or to himself.