CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

11 119 résultats pour « Behague »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1964:1216DEC000229464

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 1964

16 décembre 1964

Submitting a power-of-attorney signed by her husband, Helga Gericke has introduced the present Application both on her own behalf and as representative of her husband, Wilhelm Gericke.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231318

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

They complained that they had not been given an opportunity to be heard, to examine witnesses on their behalf and to effectively challenge the officials’ personal observation on which their conviction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154292

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2015

8 avril 2015

Namely, it was established that in the pre-trial proceedings, Z.K. had represented company A. and lodged an objection against the order for a temporary seizure of proceeds of crime on its behalf.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2011:CO01221

Cassation

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

, que le 22 mai 2004, la société Natixis lease (le crédit-bailleur) a consenti à la société TPS Travaux publics services (la société TPS) un contrat de crédit-bail portant sur une remorque benne GT Benalu

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0713DEC000412469

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 1970

13 juillet 1970

According to his further submissions, the applicant's right to have witnesses examined on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him has been also violated in that, although his counsel

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0930DEC004741199

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2003

30 septembre 2003

COMPLAINTS The mother complained, on her own behalf and on behalf of her son, under Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention, alleging that the care order violated the son’s right to respect for family life

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006JUD003074203

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

    The fifth applicant, Mrs Narinci Acar, claimed damages on her own behalf and on behalf of her nine children, who were aged between four months and seventeen years at the time of the killing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0208JUD004949199

Admin. suprême

8 février 2005

8 février 2005

    Russia and Belarus are members of the CIS.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231289

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

In particular, was the applicant able to examine witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf, as required by Article   6 § 3   (d) of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE

Cuteanc/Roumanie

ECLI:CEDH:001-202879

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2020

15 avril 2020

Finlande (déc.), n o 37442/97, 9 juillet 2002   ; Beraru c.   Roumanie , n o 40107/04, § 64, 18 mars 2014 et Cutean c. Roumanie , n o   53150/12, § 61, 2 décembre 2014)   ?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC000227505

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2008

18 novembre 2008

On 5   September 1994 the bank account of the defendant was seized, but the money could not be transferred to Belarus because in 1995-1996 Belarus did not accept Moldovan currency.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC005204611

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

By letter dated 17   April 2014 the Government’s friendly ‑ settlement proposal was forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit comments on behalf of the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167647

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2016

21 septembre 2016

They bring this application on their own behalf and on behalf of their daughter Ms Lyudmila Nikolayevna Kiseleva, born in 1999, also a Russian national and a minor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC006355716

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

The application was lodged on its behalf by its General Director, Ms   S.   Rasulova. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3630

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2005

24 novembre 2005

Two experts noted; among other things, that according to a map in the calendar certain territories of Belarus, Poland and Russia were “ethnic Lithuanian lands under temporary occupation”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119DEC002031915

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2019

19 novembre 2019

By a letter of 26 April 2019 the applicant’s representative was invited to submit by 7 June 2019 at the latest any written observations she might wish to make in reply on behalf of the applicant, together

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219398

Admin. suprême

29 août 2022

29 août 2022

In October 2020 Ms M.L. lodged the present application for and on behalf of the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4661

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2003

21 octobre 2003

There were exceptional circumstances in the present case which entitled the bank’s former chairman and majority shareholder to lodge a valid application on the bank’s behalf: preliminary objection rejected

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248862

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2026

26 janvier 2026

The application was submitted by N.G. in her own name and on G.B.’s behalf, the latter having been detained at the time. G.B. was N.G.’s brother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10299

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2014

25 novembre 2014

Law Article 34 (Locus standi of the grandparents to lodge an application on behalf of the grandchildren ): The children’s parents had never been deprived of parental responsibility nor were the children

Source officielle

Page 48 sur 556

← PrécédentSuivant →